ArticleCureus2023
Accuracy of Self-Estimated BMI in the Context of Telephone Assessment Before Elective General Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study aimed to determine if self-estimated body mass index (BMI) from telephone consultation was accurate and useful for surgical planning prior to elective general surgery. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed under a single surgeon at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. Estimated BMI was collected from consecutive patients attending a pre-operative telephone consultation. Actual BMI was measured on the day of surgery and compared. Patient age and gender were also collected. Results Data were collected from 124 participants (median age 59 years, 49.2% male). A total of 33 participants under-estimated, 53 over-estimated, and 38 accurately estimated their BMIs. The median change in BMI was 0.0 (IQR -0.1, 0.3, p = 0.003). The median change in males was 0.0 (-0.1, 0.2, p = 0.479) compared to 0.1 (0.0, 0.7, p = 0.002) in females. Those with an actual BMI > 29.9 had a significantly higher median change (0.2 {0.0, 1.1}) compared to those with BMI ≤ 29.9 (0.0 {-0.2, 0.1}; p <0.001). Only two patients could have required a change in surgeon on the day of the procedure and this was not statistically significant (p = 0.500). Conclusions Self-estimated BMI, collected via telephone consultation, is a suitable method for assessing patients for surgical planning ahead of elective general surgery procedures, particularly for males. However, it is important to be aware that those with higher BMIs, particularly females, may underestimate their BMIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.