Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162763›Full record

ArticleData science in science2022

Quantifying Distances Between Non-Elliptical Clusters to Enhance the Identification of Meaningful Emotional Reactivity Subtypes.

M L Wallace, L McTeague, J L Graves, N Kissel, C Tortora, B Wheeler, S Iyengar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data science in science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M L WallaceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.
L McTeagueDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
J L GravesUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
N KisselDepartment of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University.
C TortoraDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Jose State University.
B WheelerSchool of Computing and Information, University of Pittsburgh.
S IyengarDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh.

Funding

Subject Management and BiobankingP50DA046346 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Daniel J. Buysse, Colleen A McClung · 2020 to 2026
$23.4M
Cutting- Edge Clustering of Emotional Reactivity to Reveal Novel Anxiety SubtypesR03MH116478 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCTEAGUE, LISA M · 2018 to 2019
$165k
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA046346NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH116478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated emotional responses across psychophysiological and subjective indices is a cornerstone of adaptive emotional functioning. Using clustering to identify cross-diagnostic subgroups with similar emotion response profiles may suggest novel underlying mechanisms and treatments.However, many psychophysiological measures are non-normal even in homogenous samples, and over-reliance on traditional elliptical clustering approaches may inhibit the identification of meaningful subgroups. Finite mixture models that allow for non-elliptical cluster distributions is an emerging methodological field that may overcome this hurdle. Furthermore, succinctly quantifying pairwise cluster separation could enhance the clinical utility of the clustering solutions. However, a comprehensive examination of distance measures in the context of elliptical and non-elliptical model-based clustering is needed to provide practical guidance on the computation, benefits, and disadvantages of existing measures. We summarize several measures that can quantify the multivariate distance between two clusters and suggest practical computational tools. Through a simulation study, we evaluate the measures across three scenarios that allow for clusters to differ in location, scale, skewness, and rotation. We then demonstrate our approaches using psychophysiological and subjective responses to emotional imagery captured through the Transdiagnostic Anxiety Study. Finally, we synthesize findings to provide guidance on how to use distance measures in clustering applications.

Indexed as

Distance MeasureEmotion ResponseFinite Mixture ModelPsychophysiologyResearch Domain CriteriaSkewed Data

Identifiers

PMID37162763
PMCPMC10166186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.