Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162632›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2023

Fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation: a convolutional neural network-based model on sparsely annotated MRI.

Martin Černý, Jan Kybic, Martin Májovský, Vojtěch Sedlák, Karin Pirgl, Eva Misiorzová, Radim Lipina, David Netuka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin ČernýDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic. dr.martin.cerny@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-0554
Jan KybicDepartment of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, 166 27, Praha 6, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-4947
Martin MájovskýDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-5181
Vojtěch SedlákDepartment of Radiodiagnostics, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-9680
Karin PirglDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-2799
Eva MisiorzováDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-7900
Radim LipinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790/5, 708 52, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8388-1311
David NetukaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Central Military Hospital Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Praha 6, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8609-4789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop a fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that can work without user interaction and evaluate its accuracy and utility for clinical applications. We trained two independent artificial neural networks on MRI scans of 394 patients. The scans were acquired according to various imaging protocols over the course of 11 years on 1.5T and 3T MRI systems. The segmentation model assigned a class label to each input pixel (pituitary adenoma, internal carotid artery, normal pituitary gland, background). The slice segmentation model classified slices as clinically relevant (structures of interest in slice) or irrelevant (anterior or posterior to sella turcica). We used MRI data of another 99 patients to evaluate the performance of the model during training. We validated the model on a prospective cohort of 28 patients, Dice coefficients of 0.910, 0.719, and 0.240 for tumour, internal carotid artery, and normal gland labels, respectively, were achieved. The slice selection model achieved 82.5% accuracy, 88.7% sensitivity, 76.7% specificity, and an AUC of 0.904. A human expert rated 71.4% of the segmentation results as accurate, 21.4% as slightly inaccurate, and 7.1% as coarsely inaccurate. Our model achieved good results comparable with recent works of other authors on the largest dataset to date and generalized well for various imaging protocols. We discussed future clinical applications, and their considerations. Models and frameworks for clinical use have yet to be developed and evaluated.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerProspective StudiesImage segmentationMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingPituitary adenoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.