ArticleNeurosurgical review2023
Fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation: a convolutional neural network-based model on sparsely annotated MRI.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal MRI reveals adolescent pituitary growth patterns linked to puberty and environmental exposures.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- An advanced automated pipeline for brain tumour segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging for gamma knife radiosurgery.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Systematic review of pituitary gland and pituitary adenoma automatic segmentation techniques in magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Automated segmentation of pituitary adenomas, pituitary gland, and internal carotid arteries on routine coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI: a single-sequence feasibility study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Automated assessment of Knosp grade from pituitary adenoma MRI: Experimental comparison of a rule-based and a machine learning-based approach.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Radiomic Applications in Skull Base Pathology: A Systematic Review of Potential Clinical Uses.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025Article
- Automated Segmentation of the Pituitary and Pineal Glands.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Fully automated grading of pituitary adenoma.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
- deepPGSegNet: MRI-based pituitary gland segmentation using deep learning.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that can work without user interaction and evaluate its accuracy and utility for clinical applications. We trained two independent artificial neural networks on MRI scans of 394 patients. The scans were acquired according to various imaging protocols over the course of 11 years on 1.5T and 3T MRI systems. The segmentation model assigned a class label to each input pixel (pituitary adenoma, internal carotid artery, normal pituitary gland, background). The slice segmentation model classified slices as clinically relevant (structures of interest in slice) or irrelevant (anterior or posterior to sella turcica). We used MRI data of another 99 patients to evaluate the performance of the model during training. We validated the model on a prospective cohort of 28 patients, Dice coefficients of 0.910, 0.719, and 0.240 for tumour, internal carotid artery, and normal gland labels, respectively, were achieved. The slice selection model achieved 82.5% accuracy, 88.7% sensitivity, 76.7% specificity, and an AUC of 0.904. A human expert rated 71.4% of the segmentation results as accurate, 21.4% as slightly inaccurate, and 7.1% as coarsely inaccurate. Our model achieved good results comparable with recent works of other authors on the largest dataset to date and generalized well for various imaging protocols. We discussed future clinical applications, and their considerations. Models and frameworks for clinical use have yet to be developed and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37162632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.