Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162617›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2023

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: a classification proposal.

Andrea Lavorato, Gelsomina Aruta, Raffaele De Marco, Pietro Zeppa, Paolo Titolo, Michele Rosario Colonna, Mariarosaria Galeano, Alfio Luca Costa, Francesca Vincitorio, Diego Garbossa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Continuous versus interrupted epineural repair in forearm nerve injuries.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea LavoratoNeurosurgery Unit, Igea Hospital, via Marcona 69, 20129, Milan, Italy.
Gelsomina ArutaDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Raffaele De MarcoDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Pietro ZeppaDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paolo TitoloTraumatology-Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, CTO Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Michele Rosario ColonnaDepartment Human Pathology, University of Messina, Viale Della Libertà 395, 98121, Messina, Italy. mrcolonna1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-4066
Mariarosaria GaleanoDepartment of Biological Imaging and Morphology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Alfio Luca CostaClinic of Plastic Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Francesca VincitorioDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Diego GarbossaDepartment of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", Neurosurgery Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Bruno BattistonTraumatology-Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, CTO Hospital, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITCTO Hospital · ITUniversity of Messina · ITInterventi Geo Ambientali (Italy) · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) include several conditions in which one or more peripheral nerves are damaged. Trauma is one of the most common causes of PNIs and young people are particularly affected. They have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and on the healthcare system, while timing and type of surgical treatment are of the utmost importance to guarantee the most favorable functional recovery. To date, several different classifications of PNIs have been proposed, most of them focusing on just one or few aspects of these complex conditions, such as type of injury, anatomic situation, or prognostic factors. Current classifications do not enable us to have a complete view of this pathology, which includes diagnosis, treatment choice, and possible outcomes. This fragmentation sometimes leads to an ambiguous definition of PNIs and the impossibility of exchanging crucial information between different physicians and healthcare structures, which can create confusion in the choice of therapeutic strategies and timing of surgery. MATERIALS: The authors retrospectively analyzed a group of 24 patients treated in their center and applied a new classification for PNI injuries. They chose (a) five injury-related factors, namely nerve involved, lesion site, nerve type (whether motor, sensory or mixed), surrounding tissues (whether soft tissues were involved or not), and lesion type-whether partial/in continuity or complete. An alphanumeric code was applied to each of these classes, and (b) four prognostic codes, related to age, timing, techniques, and comorbidities.

resultsAn alphanumeric code was produced, similar to that used in the AO classification of fractures.

conclusionsThe authors propose this novel classification for PNIs, with the main advantage to allow physicians to easily understand the characteristics of nerve lesions, severity, possibility of spontaneous recovery, onset of early complications, need for surgical treatment, and the best surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: according to the Oxford 2011 level of evidence, level 2.

Indexed as

Fractures, BonePeripheral Nerve InjuriesAdolescentHumansPrognosisQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesClassificationInjuriesPeripheral nervePrognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID37162617
PMCPMC10172513
OpenAlexW4376121109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.