Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162565›Full record

ReviewMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2023

Understanding the genomic selection for crop improvement: current progress and future prospects.

Rabiya Parveen, Mankesh Kumar, Swapnil, Digvijay Singh, Monika Shahani, Zafar Imam, Jyoti Prakash Sahoo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rabiya ParveenDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, India.
Mankesh KumarDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, India.
SwapnilDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi, 761211, India.
Digvijay SinghDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Narayan Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Gopal Narayan Singh University, Sasaram, 821305, India.
Monika ShahaniDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, India.
Zafar ImamDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, India.
Jyoti Prakash SahooDepartment of Agriculture and Allied Sciences, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 752054, India. jyotiprakash.sahoo@cgu-odisha.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-491X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although increased use of modern breeding techniques and technology has resulted in long-term genetic gain, the pace of genetic gain must be sped up to satisfy global agricultural demand. However, marker-assisted selection has proven its potential for improving qualitative traits with large effects regulated by one to few genes. Its contribution to the improvement of the quantitative traits regulated by a number of small-effect genes is modest. In this context, genomic selection (GS) has been regarded as the most promising method for genetically enhancing complicated features that are regulated by several genes, each of which has minor effects. By examining a population's phenotypes and high-density marker scores, genomic selection can forecast the breeding potential of individual lines. The fact that GS uses all marker data in the prediction model prevents skewed marker effect estimations and maximizes the amount of variation caused by small-effect QTL. It has the ability to speed up the breeding cycle and as a consequence of which superior genotypes are selected rapidly. Developing the best GS models while taking into account non-additive effects, genotype-by-environment interaction, and cost-effectiveness will enable the widespread implementation of GS in plants. These steps will also increase heritability estimation and prediction accuracy. This review focuses on the shift from conventional selection methods to GS, underlying statistical tools and methodologies, the state of GS research in agricultural plants, and prospects for its effective use in the creation of climate-resilient crops.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingSelection, GeneticGenomeGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypeCrop improvementGenomicsGenomic selectionPlant breeding

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.