Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162201›Full record

ArticleAJOB empirical bioethics2023

"I Have Fought for so Many Things": Disadvantaged families' Efforts to Obtain Community-Based Services for Their Child after Genomic Sequencing.

Sara L Ackerman, Julia E H Brown, Astrid Zamora, Simon Outram

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOB empirical bioethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sustainability in translational genomics research with undiagnosed patients: What is it, why do we need it, and how do we do it?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara L AckermanProgram in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3567-7698
Julia E H BrownProgram in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Astrid ZamoraProgram in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Simon OutramProgram in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Sharing Aggregate Genomics Research Findings with Diverse Participants: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Design StrategyU01HG009599 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KOENIG, BARBARA A., KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2017 to 2021
$16.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamilies whose child has unexplained intellectual or developmental differences often hope that a genetic diagnosis will lower barriers to community-based therapeutic and support services. However, there is little known about efforts to mobilize genetic information outside the clinic or how socioeconomic disadvantage shapes and constrains outcomes.

methodsWe conducted an ethnographic study with predominantly socioeconomically disadvantaged families enrolled in a multi-year genomics research study, including clinic observations and in-depth interviews in English and Spanish at multiple time points. Coding and thematic development were used to collaboratively interpret fieldnotes and transcripts.

resultsThirty-two families participated. Themes included familial expectations that a genetic diagnosis could be translated into information, understanding, and assistance to improve the quality of a child's day-to-day life. After sequencing, however, genetic information was not readily converted into improved access to services beyond the clinic, with families often struggling to use a genetic diagnosis to advocate for their child.

conclusionFamilies' ability to use a genetic diagnosis as an effective advocacy tool beyond the clinic was limited by the knowledge and resources available to them, and by the eligibility criteria used by therapeutic service providers' - which focused on clinical diagnosis and functional criteria more than etiologic information. All families undertaking genomic testing, particularly those who are disadvantaged, need additional support to understand the limits and potential benefits of genetic information beyond the clinic.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesGenetic TestingChildHumansdevelopmental conditionsELSIethnographyGenomicspediatrictherapeutic odysseyutility

Identifiers

PMID37162201
PMCPMC10615790
OpenAlexW4376105647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.