Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162188›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Large-scale electrophysiology and deep learning reveal distorted neural signal dynamics after hearing loss.

Shievanie Sabesan, Andreas Fragner, Ciaran Bench, Fotios Drakopoulos, Nicholas A Lesica

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shievanie SabesanEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andreas FragnerPerceptual Technologies, London, United Kingdom.
Ciaran BenchEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fotios DrakopoulosEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas A LesicaEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-4462
University College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200942/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeners with hearing loss often struggle to understand speech in noise, even with a hearing aid. To better understand the auditory processing deficits that underlie this problem, we made large-scale brain recordings from gerbils, a common animal model for human hearing, while presenting a large database of speech and noise sounds. We first used manifold learning to identify the neural subspace in which speech is encoded and found that it is low-dimensional and that the dynamics within it are profoundly distorted by hearing loss. We then trained a deep neural network (DNN) to replicate the neural coding of speech with and without hearing loss and analyzed the underlying network dynamics. We found that hearing loss primarily impacts spectral processing, creating nonlinear distortions in cross-frequency interactions that result in a hypersensitivity to background noise that persists even after amplification with a hearing aid. Our results identify a new focus for efforts to design improved hearing aids and demonstrate the power of DNNs as a tool for the study of central brain structures.

Indexed as

DeafnessDeep LearningHearing LossHearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionAnimalsElectrophysiologyHumansdeep learninggerbilhearing lossneural codingneural dynamicsneurosciencespeech

Identifiers

PMID37162188
PMCPMC10202456
OpenAlexW4376121143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.