ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023
Visual information following object grasp supports digit position variability and swift anticipatory force control.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid virtual reality object lifting matches real-world object lifting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Stability of performance in a hierarchical system during isometric force production and effects of visual feedback.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Repetition Hampers Flexible Object Manipulation Under Visual Uncertainty.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticipatory force control underlying dexterous manipulation has historically been understood to rely on visual object properties and on sensorimotor memories associated with previous experiences with similar objects. However, it is becoming increasingly recognized that anticipatory force control also relies on how an object is grasped. Experiments that allow unconstrained grasp contact points when preventing tilting an object with an off-centered mass show trial-to-trial variations in digit position and subsequent scaling of lift forces, all before feedback of object properties becomes available. Here, we manipulated the availability of visual information before reach onset and after grasp contact (with no vision during the reach) to determine the contribution and timing of visual information processing to the scaling of fingertip forces during dexterous manipulation at flexible contact points. Results showed that anticipatory force control was similarly successful, quantified as an appropriate compensatory torque at lift onset that counters the external torque of an object with a left and right center of mass, irrespective of the timing and availability of visual information. However, the way in which anticipatory force control was achieved varied depending on the availability of visual information. Visual information following grasp contact was associated with greater use of an asymmetric thumb and index finger grasp configuration to generate a compensatory torque and digit position variability, together with faster fingertip force scaling and sensorimotor learning. This result supports the hypothesis that visual information at a critical and functionally relevant time point following grasp contact supports variable and swift digit-based force control for dexterous object manipulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.