Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37162063›Full record

ReviewMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2023

A short history of innate immunity.

Yuri Chaves Martins, Flávia Lima Ribeiro-Gomes, Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of TLRs as signaling cascades to combat infectious diseases: a review.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Innate Immune Cells in Melanoma: Implications for Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Neddylation Regulation of Immune Responses.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuri Chaves MartinsSaint Louis University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Saint Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-4979
Flávia Lima Ribeiro-GomesFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa, Diagnóstico e Treinamento em Malária, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-RibeiroFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Pesquisa, Diagnóstico e Treinamento em Malária, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate immunity refers to the mechanisms responsible for the first line of defense against pathogens, cancer cells and toxins. The innate immune system is also responsible for the initial activation of the body's specific immune response (adaptive immunity). Innate immunity was studied and further developed in parallel with adaptive immunity beginning in the first half of the 19th century and has been gaining increasing importance to our understanding of health and disease. In the present overview, we describe the main findings and ideas that contributed to the development of innate immunity as a continually expanding branch of modern immunology. We start with the toxicological studies by Von Haller and Magendie, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, and continue with the discoveries in invertebrate immunity that supported the discovery and characterization of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and pattern recognition receptors that led to the development of the pattern recognition and danger theory.

Indexed as

Immunity, Innate

Identifiers

PMID37162063
PMCPMC10168657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.