SynthesisLeadership in health services (Bradford, England)2023
Health-care leaders' experiences of the competencies required for crisis management during COVID-19: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
Synthesis in Leadership in health services (Bradford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Just Dive Right In!" Nurse Leaders' Experiences of Challenging Times in Clinical Settings: A Phenomenological Study.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
- Essential competencies required of nurse managers in times of COVID-19: A scoping review.International nursing review · 2025Article
- Towards a Crisis Management Playbook: Hospice and Palliative Team Members' Views Amid COVID-19.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2024Article
- Healthcare leaders navigating complexity: a scoping review of key trends in future roles and competencies.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Crisis management competencies needed in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study of nurse leaders.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Healthcare Decision-Making in a Crisis: A Qualitative Systemic Review Protocol.Emergency medicine international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis paper aims to synthesize health-care leaders' experiences of the competencies required for crisis management. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The systematic review followed the joanna briggs institute (JBI) guidance for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The search strategy included free text words and medical subject headings and peer-reviewed qualitative studies published in English, Finnish and Swedish and was not limited by year or country of publication. The databases searched in March 2022 were Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, ABI/INFORM and the Finnish database Medic. Gray literature was searched using MedNar and EBSCO Open Dissertations. Studies were screened by title and abstract (
findingsFifty-one findings (themes and subthemes) were extracted, and 11 categories were created based on their similarities. Five synthesized findings were developed: the competence to comprehend the operational environment; the competence to stay resilient amidst change; the competence to adapt to and manage change; the competence to manage and take care of staff; and the competence to co-operate and communicate with diverse stakeholders. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This systematic review produced novel information about health-care leaders' experiences of the competencies required for crisis management during COVID-19. This study complements the field of research into crisis management in health care by introducing five original and unique competency clusters required for crisis management during the acute phase of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.