Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37161820›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Combined RBE and OER optimization in proton therapy with FLUKA based on EF5-PET.

Helge Henjum, Tordis Johnsen Dahle, Andrea Mairani, Sara Pilskog, Camilla Stokkevåg, Camilla Grindeland Boer, Kathrine Røe Redalen, Heikki Minn, Eirik Malinen, Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Helge HenjumDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Tordis Johnsen DahleDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Andrea MairaniCentro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, Italy.
Sara PilskogDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla StokkevågDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla Grindeland BoerDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Kathrine Røe RedalenDepartment of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Heikki MinnDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Eirik MalinenDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kristian Smeland Ytre-HaugeDepartment of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NONational Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy · ITNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOTurku PET Centre · FIUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Norwegian Cancer Society 202089The Research Council of Norway 326218Trond Mohn Foundation BFS2015TMT03Trond Mohn Foundation BFS2017TMT07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTumor hypoxia is associated with poor treatment outcome. Hypoxic regions are more radioresistant than well-oxygenated regions, as quantified by the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). In optimization of proton therapy, including OER in addition to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) could therefore be used to adapt to patient-specific radioresistance governed by intrinsic radiosensitivity and hypoxia.

methodsA combined RBE and OER weighted dose (ROWD) calculation method was implemented in a FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment planning tool. The method is based on the linear quadratic model, with α and β parameters as a function of the OER, and therefore a function of the linear energy transfer (LET) and partial oxygen pressure (pO

resultsFor the HNC patients, treatment plans in line with the prescription dose and with acceptable target ROWD could be generated with the established tool. The physical dose was the main factor modulated in the ROWD. The impact of incorporating OER during optimization of HNC patients was demonstrated by the substantial difference found between ROWD and physical dose in the hypoxic tumor region. The largest physical dose differences between the ROWD optimized plans and the reference plan was 12.2 Gy.

conclusionThe FLUKA MC based tool was able to optimize proton treatment plans taking the tumor pO

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsProton TherapyHumansHypoxiaOxygenPositron-Emission TomographyRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRelative Biological EffectivenessOxygenhypoxiaoxygen enhancement ratioproton therapyrelative biological effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID37161820
PMCPMC10476997
OpenAlexW4376121849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.