ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Terminology binding with SNOMED CT to bridge differences in information structures: a feasibility study.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- Identifying Missing IS-A Relations in SNOMED CT with Fine-Tuned Pre-trained Language Models and Non-lattice Subgraphs.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiomedical ontologies are representations of biomedical knowledge that provide terms with precisely defined meanings. They play a vital role in facilitating biomedical research in a cross-disciplinary manner. Quality issues of biomedical ontologies will hinder their effective usage. One such quality issue is missing concepts. In this study, we introduce a logical definition-based approach to identify potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT. A unique contribution of our approach is that it is capable of obtaining both logical definitions and fully specified names for potential missing concepts.
methodThe logical definitions of unrelated pairs of fully defined concepts in non-lattice subgraphs that indicate quality issues are intersected to generate the logical definitions of potential missing concepts. A text summarization model (called PEGASUS) is fine-tuned to predict the fully specified names of the potential missing concepts from their generated logical definitions. Furthermore, the identified potential missing concepts are validated using external resources including the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), biomedical literature in PubMed, and a newer version of SNOMED CT.
resultsFrom the March 2021 US Edition of SNOMED CT, we obtained a total of 30,313 unique logical definitions for potential missing concepts through the intersecting process. We fine-tuned a PEGASUS summarization model with 289,169 training instances and tested it on 36,146 instances. The model achieved 72.83 of ROUGE-1, 51.06 of ROUGE-2, and 71.76 of ROUGE-L on the test dataset. The model correctly predicted 11,549 out of 36,146 fully specified names in the test dataset. Applying the fine-tuned model on the 30,313 unique logical definitions, 23,031 total potential missing concepts were identified. Out of these, a total of 2,312 (10.04%) were automatically validated by either of the three resources.
conclusionsThe results showed that our logical definition-based approach for identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT is encouraging. Nevertheless, there is still room for improving the performance of naming concepts based on logical definitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.