Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37161532›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2023

Breast cancer genomes from CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation carriers lack somatic TP53 mutations and display a unique structural variant size distribution profile.

Marcel Smid, Marjanka K Schmidt, Wendy J C Prager-van der Smissen, Kirsten Ruigrok-Ritstier, Maartje A C Schreurs, Sten Cornelissen, Aida Marsal Garcia, Annegien Broeks, A Mieke Timmermans, Anita M A C Trapman-Jansen and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marcel SmidDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjanka K SchmidtDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wendy J C Prager-van der SmissenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kirsten Ruigrok-RitstierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maartje A C SchreursDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sten CornelissenCore Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aida Marsal GarciaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Annegien BroeksCore Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A Mieke TimmermansDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anita M A C Trapman-JansenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Margriet ColléeDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Muriel A AdankFamily Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maartje J HooningDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John W M MartensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Antoinette HollestelleDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.hollestelle@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCHEK2 c.1100delC was the first moderate-risk breast cancer (BC) susceptibility allele discovered. Despite several genomic, transcriptomic and functional studies, however, it is still unclear how exactly CHEK2 c.1100delC promotes tumorigenesis. Since the mutational landscape of a tumor reflects the processes that have operated on its development, the aim of this study was to uncover the somatic genomic landscape of CHEK2-associated BC.

methodsWe sequenced primary BC (pBC) and normal genomes of 20 CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation carriers as well as their pBC transcriptomes. Including pre-existing cohorts, we exhaustively compared CHEK2 pBC genomes to those from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, those that displayed homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and ER- and ER+ pBCs, totaling to 574 pBC genomes. Findings were validated in 517 metastatic BC genomes subdivided into the same subgroups. Transcriptome data from 168 ER+ pBCs were used to derive a TP53-mutant gene expression signature and perform cluster analysis with CHEK2 BC transcriptomes. Finally, clinical outcome of CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers was compared with BC patients displaying somatic TP53 mutations in two well-described retrospective cohorts totaling to 942 independent pBC cases.

resultsBC genomes from CHEK2 mutation carriers were most similar to ER+ BC genomes and least similar to those of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in terms of tumor mutational burden as well as mutational signatures. Moreover, CHEK2 BC genomes did not show any evidence of HRD. Somatic TP53 mutation frequency and the size distribution of structural variants (SVs), however, were different compared to ER+ BC. Interestingly, BC genomes with bi-allelic CHEK2 inactivation lacked somatic TP53 mutations and transcriptomic analysis indicated a shared biology with TP53 mutant BC. Moreover, CHEK2 BC genomes had an increased frequency of > 1 Mb deletions, inversions and tandem duplications with peaks at specific sizes. The high chromothripsis frequency among CHEK2 BC genomes appeared, however, not associated with this unique SV size distribution profile.

conclusionsCHEK2 BC genomes are most similar to ER+ BC genomes, but display unique features that may further unravel CHEK2-driven tumorigenesis. Increased insight into this mechanism could explain the shorter survival of CHEK2 mutation carriers that is likely driven by intrinsic tumor aggressiveness rather than endocrine resistance.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCarcinogenesisCell Transformation, NeoplasticCheckpoint Kinase 2FemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesTumor Suppressor Protein p53BRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Breast cancerCHEK2ChromothripsisMutational landscapeSize distributionSomatic cancer genomeStructural variationTP53 mutationWhole-genome duplicationWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37161532
PMCPMC10169359
OpenAlexW4376131395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.