Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37161468›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2023

Mucosal immunization with lactiplantibacillus plantarum-displaying recombinant SARS-CoV-2 epitopes on the surface induces humoral and mucosal immune responses in mice.

In-Chan Hwang, Valerie Diane Valeriano, Ji Hoon Song, Marcela Pereira, Ju Kyoung Oh, Kyudong Han, Lars Engstrand, Dae-Kyung Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Surface displayed porcine epidemic diarrhea virus membrane epitopes onJournal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Mucosal immunotherapy targeting APC in lung disease.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

In-Chan Hwang *Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Valerie Diane Valeriano *Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.
Ji Hoon SongDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Marcela PereiraDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.
Ju Kyoung OhDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.
Kyudong HanDepartment of Microbiology, College of Science and Technology, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Lars EngstrandDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden.
Dae-Kyung KangDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea. dkkang@dankook.ac.kr.
Dankook University · KRKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea No. 2020R1A2C1010406 and No. 2020K1A3A1A47110820Swedish Research Council with Vetenskapsrådet No. 2020-06320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of probiotic lactic acid bacteria as a mucosal vaccine vector is considered a promising alternative compared to the use of other microorganisms because of its "Generally Regarded as Safe" status, its potential adjuvant properties, and its tolerogenicity to the host. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is highly transmissible and pathogenic. This study aimed to determine the potential of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum expressing SARS-CoV-2 epitopes as a mucosal vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.

resultsIn this study, the possible antigenic determinants of the spike (S1-1, S1-2, S1-3, and S1-4), membrane (ME1 and ME2), and envelope (E) proteins of SARS-CoV-2 were predicted, and recombinant L. plantarum strains surface-displaying these epitopes were constructed. Subsequently, the immune responses induced by these recombinant strains were compared in vitro and in vivo. Most surface-displayed epitopes induced pro-inflammatory cytokines [tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α and interleukin (IL)-6] and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7, with the highest anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory cytokine ratio in the S1-1 and S1-2 groups, followed by that in the S1-3 group. When orally administered of recombinant L. plantarum expressing SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in mice, all epitopes most increased the expression of IL-4, along with induced levels of TNF-α, interferon-gamma, and IL-10, specifically in spike protein groups. Thus, the surface expression of epitopes from the spike S1 protein in L. plantarum showed potential immunoregulatory effects, suggesting its ability to potentially circumvent hyperinflammatory states relevant to monocyte/macrophage cell activation. At 35 days post immunization (dpi), serum IgG levels showed a marked increase in the S1-1, S1-2, and S1-3 groups. Fecal IgA levels increased significantly from 21 dpi in all the antigen groups, but the boosting effect after 35 dpi was explicitly observed in the S1-1, S1-2, and S1-3 groups. Thus, the oral administration of SARS-CoV-2 antigens into mice induced significant humoral and mucosal immune responses.

conclusionThis study suggests that L. plantarum is a potential vector that can effectively deliver SARS-CoV-2 epitopes to intestinal mucosal sites and could serve as a novel approach for SARS-CoV-2 mucosal vaccine development.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AnimalsCOVID-19 VaccinesCytokinesEpitopesHumansImmunity, MucosalImmunizationInterleukin-10MiceTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCOVID-19 VaccinesCytokinesEpitopesInterleukin-10Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaLactiplantibacillus plantarumMucosal delivery vectorOral vaccineSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37161468
PMCPMC10169176
OpenAlexW4376115953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.