Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37161438›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2023

Comparing ultrasonographically assessed carotid and abdominal aorta plaques in cardiovascular disease risk estimation.

Karri Parkkila, Y Antero Kesäniemi, Olavi Ukkola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karri ParkkilaMedical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. karri.parkkila@student.oulu.fi.
Y Antero KesäniemiMedical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Olavi UkkolaMedical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
University of Oulu · FIOulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual risk estimation is an essential part of cardiovascular (CV) disease prevention. Several imaging parameters have been studied for this purpose. Based on mounting evidence, international guidelines recommend the ultrasound assessment of carotid artery plaques to refine individual risk estimation. Previous studies have not compared carotid artery and abdominal aorta plaques in CV risk estimation. Our aim was to explore this matter in a prospective study setting.

methodsParticipants were part of the Oulu Project Elucidating Risk of Atherosclerosis (OPERA) project. All participants (n = 1007, 50% males, aged 51.3 ± 6.0 years) were clinically examined in the beginning of 1990's and followed until the end 2014 for fatal and non-fatal CV events.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 22.5 (17.5-23.2) years, 246 (24%) participants suffered a CV event and 79 (32%) of those CV events were fatal. When compared to those without plaques, both carotid (hazard ratio, HR 2.854 [95% confidence interval, CI, 2.188-3.721, p < 0.001) and abdominal aorta plaques (HR 2.534 [1.503-4.274], p < 0.001) were major risk factors for CV events as an aggregate endpoint. These associations remained even after adjusting the multivariable models with age, sex, systolic blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, LDL cholesterol, and with previous CV events (coronary artery disease and stroke/transient ischemic attack). However, only carotid plaques were significant risk factors for fatal CV events: multivariable adjusted HR 2.563 (1.452-4.524), p = 0.001. Furthermore, reclassification and discrimination parameters were improved only when carotid plaques were added to a baseline risk model. Adding abdominal aorta plaques to the baseline risk model improved C-statistic from 0.718 (0.684-0.751) to 0.721 (0.688-0.754) whereas carotid plaques improved it to 0.743 (0.710-0.776).

conclusionsBoth carotid and abdominal aorta plaques are significant risk factors for CV events, but only carotid plaques provide prognostic information beyond traditional CV risk factors on fatal CV events. If one ultrasound parameter for plaque detection and CV risk estimation had to be chosen, carotid plaques may be preferred over abdominal aorta.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesAorta, AbdominalCarotid Artery, CommonFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesAbdominal aortaCardiovascular diseasesCarotid arteryPlaquesUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37161438
PMCPMC10170739
OpenAlexW4376115856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.