ArticleBMC anesthesiology2023
The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence in anesthesiology prediction models: bridging the gap from black-box algorithms to clinical decision support.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Nonpharmacological Intervention for Enhancing Perioperative Care: A Narrative Review.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2024Article
- A review of evaluation approaches for explainable AI with applications in cardiology.Artificial intelligence review · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the prognostic value of HRV measurements during anesthesia for postoperative clinical outcomes prediction using machine learning models. DATA SOURCES: VitalDB, a comprehensive database of 6388 surgical patients admitted to Seoul National University Hospital. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Cases with ECG lead II recording duration of less than one hour were excluded. Cases with more than 20% of missing HRV measurements were also excluded. A total of 5641 cases were eligible for the analyses.
methodsSix machine learning models including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and an ensemble of the five baseline models were developed to predict postoperative clinical outcomes. The prediction models were trained using only clinical information, and using both clinical information and HRV features, respectively. Feature importance based on the SHAP method was used to assess the contribution of the HRV measurements to the outcome predictions. Subgroup analysis was also performed to evaluate the risk association between postoperative ICU stay and various HRV measurements such as heart rate, low-frequency power (LFP), and short-term fluctuation DFA [Formula: see text].
resultThe final cohort included 5641 unique cases, among whom 4678 (83.0%) cases had ages over 40, 2877 (51.0%) were male, 1073 (19.0%) stayed in ICU after surgery, 52 (0.9%) suffered in-hospital death, and 3167(56.1%) had a total length of hospital stay longer than 7 days. In the final test set, the highest AUROC performance with only clinical information was 0.79 for postoperative ICU stay, 0.58 for in-hospital mortality, and 0.76 for the total length of hospital stay prediction. Importantly, using both clinical information and HRV features, the AUROC performance was 0.83, 0.70, and 0.76 for the three clinical outcome predictions, respectively. Subgroup analysis found that patients with an average heart rate higher than 70, low-frequency power (LFP) < 33, and short-term fluctuation DFA [Formula: see text] < 0.95 during anesthesia, had a significantly higher risk of entering the ICU after surgery.
conclusionThis study suggested that HRV measurements during anesthesia are feasible and effective for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.