ArticleBMC neurology2023
Bleeding risk and mortality according to antithrombotic agents' exposure in cancer-related stroke patients: nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea.
Article in BMC neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Antiplatelets and Anticoagulants for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors in Cancer-Related Stroke Using the Linked Data Set.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Quality-of-life, concerns, and treatment priorities in patients with cancer-related ischemic stroke: A prospective survey study.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2023Article
- Correction: Bleeding risk and mortality according to antithrombotic agents' exposure in cancer-related stroke patients: nationwide population-based cohort study in South Korea.BMC neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIschemic stroke with active cancer is thought to have a unique mechanism compared to conventional stroke etiologies. There is no gold standard guideline for secondary prevention in patients with cancer-related stroke, hence, adequate type of antithrombotic agent for treatment is controversial.
methodsSubjects who were enrolled in National Health Insurance System Customized Research data during the period between 2010 and 2015 were observed until 2019. Subject diagnosed with ischemic stroke within six months before and 12 months after a cancer diagnosis was defined as cancer-related stroke patient. To solve immeasurable time bias, the drug exposure evaluation was divided into daily units, and each person-day was classified as four groups: antiplatelet, anticoagulant, both types, and unexposed to antithrombotic drugs. To investigate bleeding risk and mortality, Cox proportional hazards regression model with time-dependent covariates were used.
resultsTwo thousand two hundred eighty-five subjects with cancer-related stroke were followed and analyzed. A group with anticoagulation showed high estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all bleeding events compared to a group with antiplatelet (major bleeding HR, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.52; p < 0.001). And the result was also similar in the combination group (major bleeding HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.13-2.09; p = 0.006). The combination group also showed increased mortality HR compared to antiplatelet group (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.47-2.00; p < 0.001).
conclusionsBleeding risk increased in the anticoagulant-exposed group compared to antiplatelet-exposed group in cancer-related stroke patients. Thus, this result should be considered when selecting a secondary prevention drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.