ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2024
Proximal Hamate Reconstruction of Proximal Pole Scaphoid Nonunion: A Case Series and Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall proximal pole scaphoid nonunions present a clinical challenge influenced by fragment size, vascular compromise, deforming forces exerted through the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL), and potential articular fragmentation. Osteochondral autograft options for proximal pole reconstruction include the medial femoral trochlea, costochondral rib, or proximal hamate. This study reports the clinical outcomes of patients treated with proximal hamate osteochondral autograft reconstruction.
methodsA retrospective review identified patients treated with this surgery from 2 institutions with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the Visual Analog Dcale pain score, 12-item Short-Form survey, abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, wrist and forearm range of motion (ROM), radiographic assessment, and complications. We reviewed and compared these outcomes with those of the current published literature.
resultsFour patients (mean age: 24 years, 75% men) with a 12.8-month average follow-up (range: 6-20 months) were included. Radiographic union was identified in all cases by 12 weeks (range, 10-12). The average wrist ROM was 67.5% flexion/extension and 100% pronation/supination compared with the contralateral side at the final follow-up. The mean QuickDASH score was 17.6 (SD, 13). No complications were identified.
conclusionsProximal pole scaphoid nonunion reconstruction using autologous proximal hamate osteochondral graft demonstrated encouraging clinical and radiographic outcomes. Proximal hamate harvest involves minimal donor site morbidity without a distant operative site, uses an osteochondral graft with similar morphology to the proximal scaphoid, requires no microsurgical technique, and permits reconstruction of the SLIL using the volar capitohamate ligament.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.