ArticleEye (London, England)2023
Comparative analysis of large language models in the Royal College of Ophthalmologists fellowship exams.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- The Accuracy and Capability of Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Health Care Examinations and Certificates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Trial
- Large Language Models for Ophthalmology Training in China: A Prospective Evaluation.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Bibliographic Analysis.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- An updated analysis of large language model performance on ophthalmology speciality examinations.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Performance of Large Language Models and Top-Decile Doctors on an Undergraduate Ophthalmology Examination.Cureus · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of a lightweight large language model chatbot for medication enquiry.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Synthetic data trained open-source language models are feasible alternatives to proprietary models for radiology reporting.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- ChatGPT-4o and OpenAI-o1: A Comparative Analysis of Its Accuracy in Refractive Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- New frontiers in generative artificial intelligence - enhancing custom GPTs with ophthalmology guidelines.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 in Solving Questions Based on Core Concepts in Cardiovascular Physiology.Cureus · 2025Article
- "Comparative analysis of large language models against the NHS 111 online triaging for emergency ophthalmology".Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Large Language Models' Responses to Spinal Cord Injury: A Comparative Study of Performance.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Comprehensiveness of Large Language Models in Patient Queries on Gingival and Endodontic Health.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Evaluation and comparison of large language models' responses to questions related optic neuritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating multiple large language models on orbital diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Application prospect of large language model represented by ChatGPT in ophthalmology.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Evaluating the competence of large language models in ophthalmology clinical practice: a multi-scenario quantitative study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.