ArticleSpinal cord2023
Quality of life after traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury: a North Indian perspective.
Article in Spinal cord, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidimensional Effects of Telemedicine on Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Health-Related Quality of Life of Spinal Cord Injury Patients Visiting the Outpatient Clinic of a Tertiary Care Rehabilitation Center in Saudi Arabia: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Functional improvements correlate with enhanced quality of life following mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in chronic spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
objectivesTo determine the Quality of Life (QOL) in individuals with traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) of thoracolumbar region in Indian population, the factors affecting QOL and to compare this to other SCI populations.
settingTertiary level hospital in low-middle income country.
methods93 individuals with SCI of minimum 1 year duration since injury were included in the study. Baseline demographics, socioeconomic parameters, and incidence of complications were ascertained. World Health Organisation Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) score was used for measurement of QOL and was then compared to healthy Indian population and other SCI studies. Subgroup analysis was done to find out impact of variables on different domains of WHOQOL-BREF.
resultsThe median (IQR) age of the study participants was 35 (25, 45) with a male predominance. The median (IQR) duration since injury in the study population was 50 (26, 70) months. Lowest mean (SD) score was observed in the psychological domain -50.3 (12.1) and comparison to healthy Indian and high-income SCI populations revealed drastically decreased scores across all domains (p < 0.01). Employed individuals and housewives had significantly higher scores across all domains than unemployed individuals (p < 0.05). American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade, socioeconomic status, pain and presence of complications all had significant impact on domain scores (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that mobilisation status and pain had the greatest effect on QOL.
conclusionIndividuals with SCI have low QOL scores as compared to general Indian population as well as SCI individuals from a high resource setting. Pain and dependent mobilisation were found to be most significant predictors of poor WHOQOL-BREF domain scores. Housewives were found to have domain scores comparable to employed individuals. Presence of complications negatively impacts QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.