Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37161000›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2023

Light-sheets and smart microscopy, an exciting future is dawning.

Stephan Daetwyler, Reto Paul Fiolka

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MAPseq2: a sensitive barcoded connectomics method.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephan DaetwylerLyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-4734
Reto Paul FiolkaLyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. reto.fiolka@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4636-5000
Southwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Transformative microscopes to image across spatiotemporal scalesR35GM133522 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Reto Paul Fiolka · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy has transformed our ability to visualize and quantitatively measure biological processes rapidly and over long time periods. In this review, we discuss current and future developments in light-sheet fluorescence microscopy that we expect to further expand its capabilities. This includes smart and adaptive imaging schemes to overcome traditional imaging trade-offs, i.e., spatiotemporal resolution, field of view and sample health. In smart microscopy, a microscope will autonomously decide where, when, what and how to image. We further assess how image restoration techniques provide avenues to overcome these tradeoffs and how "open top" light-sheet microscopes may enable multi-modal imaging with high throughput. As such, we predict that light-sheet microscopy will fulfill an important role in biomedical and clinical imaging in the future.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID37161000
PMCPMC10169780
OpenAlexW4376132502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.