ArticleScientific reports2023
Streamlined quantitative analysis of histone modification abundance at nucleosome-scale resolution with siQ-ChIP version 2.0.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polycomb repression works without Siesta, theScience advances · 2026Article
- Simultaneous single-cell proteomics and epigenetic analysis of histone deacetylase inhibition in human cells.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Dual EZH1/2 inhibition enhances DNMT inhibitor efficacy in colon cancer through targeting H3K27me1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- DNA hypomethylation promotes UHRF1-and SUV39H1/H2-dependent crosstalk between H3K18ub and H3K9me3 to reinforce heterochromatin states.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- RepEnTools: an automated repeat enrichment analysis package for ChIP-seq data reveals hUHRF1 Tandem-Tudor domain enrichment in young repeats.Mobile DNA · 2024Article
- Select EZH2 inhibitors enhance viral mimicry effects of DNMT inhibition through a mechanism involving NFAT:AP-1 signaling.Science advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We recently introduced an absolute and physical quantitative scale for chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq). The scale itself was determined directly from measurements routinely made on sequencing samples without additional reagents or spike-ins. We called this approach sans spike-in quantitative ChIP, or siQ-ChIP. Herein, we extend those results in several ways. First, we simplified the calculations defining the quantitative scale, reducing practitioner burden. Second, we reveal a normalization constraint implied by the quantitative scale and introduce a new scheme for generating 'tracks'. The constraint requires that tracks are probability distributions so that quantified ChIP-seq is analogous to a mass distribution. Third, we introduce some whole-genome analyses that allow us, for example, to project the IP mass (immunoprecipitated mass) onto the genome to evaluate how much of any genomic interval was captured in the IP. We applied siQ-ChIP to p300/CBP inhibition and compare our results to those of others. We detail how the same data-level observations are misinterpreted in the literature when tracks are not understood as probability densities and are compared without correct quantitative scaling, and we offer new interpretations of p300/CBP inhibition outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.