Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37160546›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2023

Augmenting Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysms' Risk Status Using Velocity-Informatics: Initial Experience.

J Jiang, M Rezaeitaleshmahalleh, Z Lyu, Nan Mu, A S Ahmed, C M Strother Md, J J Gemmete, A S Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA. jjiang1@mtu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8812-6246
M RezaeitaleshmahallehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Z LyuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
Nan MuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA.
A S AhmedDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
C M Strother MdDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
J J GemmeteDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
A S PandeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Personalized Management of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Computer-aided AnalyticsR01EB029570 · NIBIB · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, JINGFENG · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 23POST1022454NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our primary goal here is to demonstrate that innovative analytics of aneurismal velocities, named velocity-informatics, enhances intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture status prediction. 3D computer models were generated using imaging data from 112 subjects harboring anterior IAs (4-25 mm; 44 ruptured and 68 unruptured). Computational fluid dynamics simulations and geometrical analyses were performed. Then, computed 3D velocity vector fields within the IA dome were processed for velocity-informatics. Four machine learning methods (support vector machine, random forest, generalized linear model, and GLM with Lasso or elastic net regularization) were employed to assess the merits of the proposed velocity-informatics. All 4 ML methods consistently showed that, with velocity-informatics metrics, the area under the curve and prediction accuracy both improved by approximately 0.03. Overall, with velocity-informatics, the support vector machine's prediction was most promising: an AUC of 0.86 and total accuracy of 77%, with 60% and 88% of ruptured and unruptured IAs being correctly identified, respectively.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedIntracranial AneurysmComputer SimulationHemodynamicsHumansInformaticsHemodynamicsIntracranial AneurysmMachine LearningRupture Risk PredictionVelocity-informatics

Identifiers

PMID37160546
PMCPMC10949935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.