Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37160538›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

CatBoost-based improved detection of P-wave changes in sinus rhythm and tachycardia conditions: a lead selection study.

N Prasanna Venkatesh, R Pradeep Kumar, Bala Chakravarthy Neelapu, Kunal Pal, J Sivaraman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N Prasanna VenkateshDepartment of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha, 769008, India.
R Pradeep KumarDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, Jaiprakash Hospital and Research Centre, Rourkela, Odisha, 769004, India.
Bala Chakravarthy NeelapuDepartment of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha, 769008, India.
Kunal PalDepartment of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha, 769008, India.
J SivaramanDepartment of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, Odisha, 769008, India. jsiva@nitrkl.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-2672
National Institute of Technology Rourkela · INCharnock Hospital · IN

Funding

SERB EEQ/2019/000148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examining P-wave morphological changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) is essential for characterizing atrial arrhythmias. However, standard 12-lead ECGsuffer from diagnostic redundancy due to low signal-to-noise ratio of P-waves. To address this issue, various optimal leads have been proposed for improved atrial activity recording, but the right selection among these leads is crucial for enhancing diagnostic efficacy. This study proposes an automated lead selection technique using the CatBoost machine learning (ML) model to improve the detection of P-wave changes among optimal bipolar leads under different heart rates. ECGs were obtained from healthy participants with a mean age of 25 ± 3.81 years (34% women), including 114 in sinus rhythm (SR) and 38 in sinus tachycardia (ST). The recordings were made using a newly designed atrial lead system (ALS), standard limb lead (SLL), modified limb lead (MLL), modified Lewis lead (LLM) and P-lead. P-wave features and Atrioventricular (AV) ratio were extracted for statistical analysis and ML classification. The optimum ML model was chosen to identify the best-performing optimal lead, which was selected based on the SLL metrics among different ML classifiers. CatBoost was found to outperform the other ML models in SLL-II with the highest accuracy and sensitivity of 0.82 and 0.90, respectively. The CatBoost model, amid other optimal leads, gave the best results for AL-I and AL-II (0.86 and 0.83 in accuracy and 0.91 and 0.93 in sensitivity). The developed CatBoost model selected AL-I and AL-II as the top two best-performing optimal leads for the enhanced acquisition of P-wave changes, which may be useful for diagnosing atrial arrhythmias.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAdultElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart AtriaHeart RateHumansMaleTachycardiaYoung AdultAtrial lead systemAutomated lead selectionCatBoost modelImproved atrial activityOptimal leadsP-wave changes

Identifiers

PMID37160538
OpenAlexW4376122004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.