Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37160474›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Update on The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC): the radiologist's role.

Elena K Korngold, Marc J Gollub, David H Kim, Courtney C Moreno, Gregory de Prisco, Mukesh Harisinghani, Gaurav Khatri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena K KorngoldOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. korngold@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2642-5472
Marc J GollubMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
David H KimUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Courtney C MorenoEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gregory de PriscoBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Mukesh HarisinghaniMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Gaurav KhatriUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) was established by the American College of Surgeons with the goal of standardizing care of rectal cancer patients in order to improve outcomes. NAPRC accreditation requires compliance with an established set of standards, many of which are directly related to radiology participation in multidisciplinary conference, rectal MR image acquisition, interpretation and reporting, and radiologist education. This paper outlines the pertinent standards/requirements for radiologists as part of the Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team in the NAPRC guidelines, with proposed methods and tips for implementation of these standards from the perspective of the radiologist.

Indexed as

RadiologyRectal NeoplasmsAccreditationHumansRadiologistsAccreditationNeoplasm stagingPatient Care TeamRadiologistsRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37160474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.