Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37160395›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Awareness, predictors and outcomes of drug alerts among people who access harm reduction services in British Columbia, Canada: findings from a 2021 cross-sectional survey.

Kerolos Daowd, Max Ferguson, Lisa Liu, Jackson Loyal, Kurt Lock, Brittany Graham, Jessica Lamb, Jenny McDougall, Jane A Buxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Opioid-related deaths in Northern Ontario in the early COVID-19 pandemic period.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kerolos DaowdFaculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Max FergusonHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1911-0117
Lisa LiuHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jackson LoyalHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kurt LockHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Brittany GrahamHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jessica LambHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jenny McDougallHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jane A BuxtonHarm Reduction, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada jane.buxton@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-393X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the awareness and predictors of seeing/hearing a drug alert in British Columbia (BC) and subsequent drug use behaviour after seeing/hearing an alert.

methodsThis study analysed the 2021 BC harm reduction client survey (HRCS)-a cross-sectional self-reported survey administered at harm reduction sites throughout the province and completed by participants using the services.

resultsIn total, n=537 respondents participated and n=482 (89.8%) responded to the question asking if they saw/heard a drug alert. Of those, n=300 (62.2%) stated that they saw/heard a drug alert and almost half reported hearing from a friend or peer network; the majority (67.4%) reported altering their drug use behaviour to be safer after seeing/hearing a drug alert. The proportion of individuals who saw/heard a drug alert increased with each ascending age category. Among health authorities, there were significant differences in the odds of seeing/hearing an alert. In the past 6 months, the odds of participants who attended harm reduction sites a few times per month seeing/hearing an alert were 2.73 (95% CI: 1.17 to 6.52) times the odds of those who did not. Those who attended more frequently were less likely to report seeing/hearing a drug alert. The odds of those who witnessed an opioid-related overdose in the past 6 months seeing/hearing an alert were 1.96 (95% CI: 0.86 to 4.50) times the odds of those who had not.

conclusionWe found that drug alerts were mostly disseminated through communication with friends or peers and that most participants altered their drug use behaviour after seeing/hearing a drug alert. Therefore, drug alerts can play a role in reducing harms from substance use and more work is needed to reach diverse populations, such as younger people, those in differing geographical locations, and those who attend harm reduction sites more frequently.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionOpiate OverdoseBritish ColumbiaCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesHearingHumansepidemiologyhealth policypublic health

Identifiers

PMID37160395
PMCPMC10174008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.