ArticleBMJ open2023
What is needed to effectively communicate risk during a health crisis? A qualitative study with international experts based on the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experiences of Public Health Professionals Regarding Crisis Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping risk communication practices in public health emergencies: a scoping review and comparison with Italian regional pandemic plans.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Perceptions, Preparedness, and Anticipated Challenges of Healthcare Workers and Communities for Potential Marburg virus outbreaks in South Omo, Southern Ethiopia, 2025: a qualitative case study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Key features of sustainable capacities for risk communication in health emergencies: analysis of Joint External Evaluation.Journal of global health · 2025Observational
- Words and numbers: a comparative study of medical and journalism students' descriptors of risk, numeracy and preferences for health risk communication.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Synergistic fight against future pandemics: Lessons from previous pandemics.Le infezioni in medicina · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify a framework for risk communication during health crises by using the current pandemic as a case study.
designA qualitative study based on individual interviews.
settingDifferent countries with diverse levels of perceived success on risk communication during the COVID-19 health crisis.
participantsInternational experts with experience in health crisis management or risk communication. ANALYSIS: A thematic analysis was performed supported by Atlas.ti.
resultsFour men and six women took part in the study (three from Europe, two from Latin America, two from North America, one from Asia and two from Oceania). Three major themes emerged from the data: (1) institutionalising the communication strategy; (2) defining the problem that needs to be faced; (3) developing an effective communication strategy.
conclusionRisk communication during a health crisis requires preparation of governments and of health teams in order to produce and deliver effective messages as well as to help communities to make informed and healthy decisions. This is particularly relevant for slow disasters, such as COVID-19, as the strategy must innovate to avoid information fatigue of the audience. The findings of this article could inform guidelines to best equip countries for a clear communication strategy for future crises. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021234443.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.