Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37160327›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Dynamic signatures of the Eureka effect: an EEG study.

Yiqing Lu, Wolf Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yiqing LuSinger Lab, Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany.
Wolf SingerSinger Lab, Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Eureka effect refers to the common experience of suddenly solving a problem. Here, we study this effect in a pattern recognition paradigm that requires the segmentation of complex scenes and recognition of objects on the basis of Gestalt rules and prior knowledge. In the experiments, both sensory evidence and prior knowledge were manipulated in order to obtain trials that do or do not converge toward a perceptual solution. Subjects had to detect objects in blurred scenes and indicate recognition with manual responses. Neural dynamics were assessed with high-density Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. The results show significant changes of neural dynamics with respect to spectral distribution, coherence, phase locking, and fractal dimensionality. The Eureka effect was associated with increased coherence of oscillations in the alpha and theta bands over widely distributed regions of the cortical mantle predominantly in the right hemisphere. This increase in coherence was associated with decreased beta power over parietal and central regions and with decreased alpha power over frontal and occipital areas. In addition, there was a right hemisphere-lateralized reduction of fractal dimensionality. We propose that the Eureka effect requires cooperation of cortical regions involved in working memory, creative thinking, and the control of attention.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexElectroencephalographyAttentionHumansMemory, Short-TermcoherencedimensionalityEureka effectlateralizationphase locking

Identifiers

PMID37160327
PMCPMC10321100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.