Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37160282›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023

Acceptability, Feasibility, Drug Safety, and Effectiveness of a Pilot Mass Drug Administration with a Single Round of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Plus Primaquine and Indoor Residual Spraying in Communities with Malaria Transmission in Haiti, 2018.

Michelle A Chang, Daniel Impoinvil, Karen E S Hamre, Paul-Emile Dalexis, Jean-Baptiste Mérilien, Amber M Dismer, Bernadette Fouché, Luccene Desir, Kathleen Holmes, Willy Lafortune and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Michelle A ChangMalaria Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Daniel ImpoinvilEntomology Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Karen E S HamreMalaria Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Paul-Emile DalexisIMA World Health, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Jean-Baptiste MérilienProgramme National de Contrôle de la Malaria, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Amber M DismerEmergency Response and Recovery Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bernadette FouchéCDC Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia.
Luccene DesirThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kathleen HolmesMalaria Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Willy LafortuneProgramme National de Contrôle de la Malaria, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Camelia HermanMalaria Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Eric RogierMalaria Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gregory S NolandThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Alyssa J YoungCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Thomas DruetzCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Ruth AshtonCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Thomas P EiseleCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Justin CohenClinton Health Access Initiative, Washington, District of Columbia.
Lotus van den HoogenLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Gillian StresmanLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Chris DrakeleyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Emilie PothinClinton Health Access Initiative, Washington, District of Columbia.
Ewan CameronSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Katherine E BattleInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington.
John WilliamsonMalaria Branch, Center for Global Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Marc-Aurèle TelfortProgramme National de Contrôle de la Malaria, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Jean Frantz LemoineProgramme National de Contrôle de la Malaria, Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USTulane University · USCenter for Global Health · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCarter Center · USCDC Foundation · USClinton Health Access Initiative · USCurtin University · AUInstitute for Disease Modeling · USSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a malaria elimination strategy, Haiti's National Malaria Control Program piloted a mass drug administration (MDA) with indoor residual spraying (IRS) in 12 high-transmission areas across five communes after implementing community case management and strengthened surveillance. The MDA distributed sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and single low-dose primaquine to eligible residents during house visits. The IRS campaign applied pirimiphos-methyl insecticide on walls of eligible houses. Pre- and post-campaign cross-sectional surveys were conducted to assess acceptability, feasibility, drug safety, and effectiveness of the combined interventions. Stated acceptability for MDA before the campaign was 99.2%; MDA coverage estimated at 10 weeks post-campaign was 89.6%. Similarly, stated acceptability of IRS at baseline was 99.9%; however, household IRS coverage was 48.9% because of the high number of ineligible houses. Effectiveness measured by Plasmodium falciparum prevalence at baseline and 10 weeks post-campaign were similar: 1.31% versus 1.43%, respectively. Prevalence of serological markers were similar at 10 weeks post-campaign compared with baseline, and increased at 6 months. No severe adverse events associated with the MDA were identified in the pilot; there were severe adverse events in a separate, subsequent campaign. Both MDA and IRS are acceptable and feasible interventions in Haiti. Although a significant impact of a single round of MDA/IRS on malaria transmission was not found using a standard pre- and post-intervention comparison, it is possible there was blunting of the peak transmission. Seasonal malaria transmission patterns, suboptimal IRS coverage, and low baseline parasitemia may have limited the effectiveness or the ability to measure effectiveness.

Indexed as

InsecticidesMalariaCross-Sectional StudiesDrug CombinationsFeasibility StudiesHaitiHumansMass Drug AdministrationMosquito ControlPrimaquinePyrimethamineSulfadoxineDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationInsecticidesPrimaquinePyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID37160282
PMCPMC10540127
OpenAlexW4375947498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.