Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37160146›Full record

ArticleRoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin2023

Automated Classification of Free-Text Radiology Reports: Using Different Feature Extraction Methods to Identify Fractures of the Distal Fibula.

Cornelia L A Dewald, Alina Balandis, Lena S Becker, Jan B Hinrichs, Christian von Falck, Frank K Wacker, Hans Laser, Svetlana Gerbel, Hinrich B Winther, Johanna Apfel-Starke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cornelia L A DewaldInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8805-2291
Alina BalandisCentre for Information Management (ZIMt), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lena S BeckerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jan B HinrichsInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian von FalckInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Frank K WackerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hans LaserCentre for Information Management (ZIMt), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Svetlana GerbelCentre for Information Management (ZIMt), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hinrich B WintherInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Johanna Apfel-StarkeCentre for Information Management (ZIMt), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiology reports mostly contain free-text, which makes it challenging to obtain structured data. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques transform free-text reports into machine-readable document vectors that are important for creating reliable, scalable methods for data analysis. The aim of this study is to classify unstructured radiograph reports according to fractures of the distal fibula and to find the best text mining method. MATERIALS &

methodsWe established a novel German language report dataset: a designated search engine was used to identify radiographs of the ankle and the reports were manually labeled according to fractures of the distal fibula. This data was used to establish a machine learning pipeline, which implemented the text representation methods bag-of-words (BOW), term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), principal component analysis (PCA), non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), and document embedding (doc2vec). The extracted document vectors were used to train neural networks (NN), support vector machines (SVM), and logistic regression (LR) to recognize distal fibula fractures. The results were compared via cross-tabulations of the accuracy (acc) and area under the curve (AUC).

resultsIn total, 3268 radiograph reports were included, of which 1076 described a fracture of the distal fibula. Comparison of the text representation methods showed that BOW achieved the best results (AUC = 0.98; acc = 0.97), followed by TF-IDF (AUC = 0.97; acc = 0.96), NMF (AUC = 0.93; acc = 0.92), PCA (AUC = 0.92; acc = 0.9), LDA (AUC = 0.91; acc = 0.89) and doc2vec (AUC = 0.9; acc = 0.88). When comparing the different classifiers, NN (AUC = 0,91) proved to be superior to SVM (AUC = 0,87) and LR (AUC = 0,85).

conclusionAn automated classification of unstructured reports of radiographs of the ankle can reliably detect findings of fractures of the distal fibula. A particularly suitable feature extraction method is the BOW model. KEY POINTS: · The aim was to classify unstructured radiograph reports according to distal fibula fractures.. · Our automated classification system can reliably detect fractures of the distal fibula.. · A particularly suitable feature extraction method is the BOW model.. CITATION FORMAT: · Dewald CL, Balandis A, Becker LS et al. Automated Classification of Free-Text Radiology Reports: Using Different Feature Extraction Methods to Identify Fractures of the Distal Fibula. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 713 - 719.

Indexed as

FibulaRadiologyAlgorithmsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingRadiography

Identifiers

PMID37160146
PMCPMC10368466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.