ArticleBiofabrication2023
Thermal inkjet bioprinting drastically alters cell phenotype.
Article in Biofabrication, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of 3D printing in skeletal muscle-on-a-chip models: Current applications and future potential.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Recapitulating the bone extracellular matrix through 3D bioprinting using various crosslinking chemistries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Droplet-based bioprinting.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- Review
- Advances in 3D printing for the repair of tympanic membrane perforation: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Since the first description of inkjet bioprinting of cells in 2003, quantifying the input and measuring the output of the printers has been the hallmark of the field of bioprinting, as it is virtually impossible to characterize cells that are inside the printing orifices or extrusion needles. We will describe here some recent discoveries of cell behavior due to inkjet bioprinting. Primary and immortalized adult dermal fibroblasts were expanded for 2-3 passages upon receiving. The cells were harvested, resuspended in PBS, and bioprinted into a 96-well plate with pluriSTEM media. Cells were then transferred either into precoated 96-well plates or 20
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.