ArticleCureus2023
Clinical Application of Proximal Arch Cannulation in the Surgical Treatment of Acute Type I Aortic Dissection.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The goal is to determine the best location for inserting a catheter into the aortic arch of patients with a certain type of aortic dissection (DeBakey type I) by analyzing images of the patient's aortic arch before surgery. This analysis will take into account the shape and structure of the patient's aortic arch to find the most optimal location for cannulation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection diagnosed between January 2021 and February 2023, utilizing the Carestream medical imaging software Image Suite V4 (New York, USA). The study included 67 cases that underwent surgery and 33 cases that did not. The study aimed to evaluate the optimal intubation position on the patient's aortic arch by analyzing the true and false lumen classification, true and false lumen area, and hematoma thickness on the patient's aortic arch, as observed in the aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) conducted upon admission. Results The vascular axis analysis showed a significant difference in the true lumen area among the three regions that were examined (P < 0.001). Zone 1 had a larger true lumen area of 6.40 ± 2.71 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.