ArticleCureus2023
Risk of Neonatal Sepsis With Rescue Steroids in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate whether a rescue course of corticosteroids, when given at least 14 days after the initial course, is associated with an increased risk of neonatal sepsis after preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Methods We performed a retrospective, descriptive cohort study of women with singleton gestations from 23+0 to 34+0 weeks of gestation who received a rescue course of corticosteroids within the Indiana University Health Network from January 2009 through October 2016. Patients were separated into three groups based on amniotic membrane status at the time of each corticosteroid administration: Group 1 (intact membranes at initial/intact membranes at rescue), Group 2 (intact membranes at initial/PPROM at rescue), and Group 3 (PPROM at initial/PPROM at rescue). The primary outcome (neonatal sepsis) was compared between the groups. Patient characteristics and neonatal outcomes were analyzed with Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous variables. Relative risk (RR) was calculated by comparing those with ruptured membranes to those with intact membranes at the time of rescue course administration. Results A total of 143 patients were eligible. Neonatal sepsis occurred in 6.8% of patients in Group 1, 21.1% of patients in Group 2, and 23.8% of patients in Group 3. Groups 2 and 3 had a statistically significant higher rate of neonatal sepsis than Group 1 (p = 0.021). The RR of neonatal sepsis after a rescue course in patients with PPROM (Groups 2 and 3) was 3.31 (95% CI = 1.32, 8.29) compared to those with intact membranes at the time of rescue course administration (Group 1). Conclusion A rescue course of corticosteroids in women with PPROM at the time of rescue administration was associated with an increased risk of neonatal sepsis. This increased risk was seen in women with intact membranes as well as ruptured membranes during their initial course of steroids. Larger studies are needed to further investigate this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.