ArticleHeliyon2023
A fully-automatic semi-supervised deep learning model for difficult airway assessment.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent Recognition Network for Difficult Airway Based on Multi-View Input and Attention Aggregation.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Pre-operative three-dimensional face scans for predicting difficult facemask ventilation: a prospective development study.Anaesthesia · 2026Observational
- Real-time face keypoint detection for pre-anesthetic assessment with optimized YOLO11 model based on DeBiFormer.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Difficult Airways: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for difficult airway assessment: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Difficult Airway Assessment: The Current State of Knowledge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Predictions and Identifying Key Predictors for Safer Intubation: A Study on Video Laryngoscopy Views.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Difficult Airway Assessment Based on Multi-View Metric Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Perioperative Planning and Management of Liver Resection.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Trends in Preoperative Airway Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Scope of artificial intelligence in airway management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- New Devices, Innovative Technologies, and Non-Standard Techniques for Airway Management: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Difficult airway conditions represent a substantial challenge for clinicians. Predicting such conditions is essential for subsequent treatment planning, but the reported diagnostic accuracies are still quite low. To overcome these challenges, we developed a rapid, non-invasive, cost-effective, and highly-accurate deep-learning approach to identify difficult airway conditions through photographic image analysis. Methods: For each of 1000 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, images were captured from 9 specific and different viewpoints. The collected image set was divided into training and testing subsets in the ratio of 8:2. We used a semi-supervised deep-learning method to train and test an AI model for difficult airway prediction. Results: We trained our semi-supervised deep-learning model using only 30% of the labeled training samples (with the remaining 70% used without labels). We evaluated the model performance using metrics of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The numerical values of these four metrics were found to be 90.00%, 89.58%, 90.13%, 81.13%, and 0.9435, respectively. For a fully-supervised learning scheme (with 100% of the labeled training samples used for model training), the corresponding values were 90.50%, 91.67%, 90.13%, 82.25%, and 0.9457, respectively. When three professional anesthesiologists conducted comprehensive evaluation, the corresponding results were 91.00%, 91.67%, 90.79%, 83.26%, and 0.9497, respectively. It can be seen that the semi-supervised deep learning model trained by us with only 30% labeled samples can achieve a comparable effect with the fully supervised learning model, but the sample labeling cost is smaller. Our method can achieve a good balance between performance and cost. At the same time, the results of the semi-supervised model trained with only 30% labeled samples were very close to the performance of human experts. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first one to apply a semi-supervised deep-learning method in order to identify the difficulties of both mask ventilation and intubation. Our AI-based image analysis system can be used as an effective tool to identify patients with difficult airway conditions. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2100049879 (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.