Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37159679›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Assessing the competitiveness of listed Chinese high-growth companies in the STAR market.

Wei Zhang, Shuo Li, Zhiguang Li, Hui Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Shuo LiSchool of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhiguang LiSchool of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hui FengSchool of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims to assess the competitiveness of 68 high-growth enterprises listed on China's STAR market and explore the combination of antecedent conditions that led to their listing using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. The interpretive structure model was utilized to identify the factors influencing their competitiveness, and the listing index weight for the STAR market was determined using the analytic hierarchy process. The competitiveness of the listed enterprises was found to be promising, with new energy, next-generation IT, and high-end equipment manufacturing being the most prominent fields. However, energy conservation and environmental protection exhibited relatively weak listed competitiveness. The listing of these enterprises was the result of multiple factors rather than a single factor. The listing paths of high-growth enterprises in China were classified into three types: well-operated with high technical competence and innovation-led, high-profit with low growth and innovation, and large-scale, high-profit, and innovation-led.

Indexed as

CompetitivenessfsQCAHigh-growth enterprisesInterpretive structure modelScience and technology innovation boardSTAR market

Identifiers

PMID37159679
PMCPMC10163631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.