Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37159250›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Traumatic Brain Injury Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program: Protocol for a Partnered Evaluation Initiative Mixed Methods Study.

Jolie N Haun, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Christine Melillo, Jacob Kean, Rachel C Benzinger, Tali Schneider, Mary Jo V Pugh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jolie N HaunJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Research Service, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-3763
Risa Nakase-RichardsonJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Research Service, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0717-6706
Christine MelilloJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Research Service, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-6605
Jacob KeanVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8577-0586
Rachel C BenzingerJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Research Service, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-7929
Tali SchneiderJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Research Service, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-4534
Mary Jo V PughVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4196-7763
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital · USUniversity of South Florida · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe traumatic brain injury (TBI) Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Program (IETP) is an innovative modality for delivering evidence-based treatments in a residential, inpatient format to special operational forces service members and veterans with mild TBI. IETPs provide bundled evidence-based assessment, treatment, referral, and case management in concordance with the existing guidelines for mild TBI and commonly co-occurring comorbidities. To date, there has been no formal characterization or evaluation of the IETP to understand the determinants of implementation across the system of care. The goal of our partnered evaluation initiative (PEI) with an operational partner, the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation National Program Office, is to facilitate the full implementation of the IETP across all 5 Veterans Health Administration TBI-Centers of Excellence (TBI-COE) and to inform minimum standards while supporting the unique characteristics of each site.

objectiveThis IETP partnered evaluation will describe each of the 5 TBI-COE IETP services and state of implementation to identify opportunities for adaptation and scale, characterize the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical services received, evaluate the outcomes for participants in the IETP, and inform ongoing implementation and knowledge translation efforts to support IETP expansion. In alignment with the goals of the protocol, ineffective treatment components will be targeted for deimplementation.

methodsA 3-year concurrent mixed methods evaluation using a participatory approach in collaboration with the operational partner and TBI-COE site leadership will be conducted. Qualitative observations, semistructured focus groups, and interviewing methods will be used to describe IETP, stakeholder experiences and needs, and suggestions for IETP implementation. Quantitative methods will include primary data collection from patients in the IETP at each site to characterize long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction with treatment and secondary data collection to quantitatively characterize patient-level and care system-level data. Finally, data sets will be triangulated to share data findings with partners to inform ongoing implementation efforts.

resultsData collection began in December 2021 and is currently ongoing. The results and deliverables will inform IETP characterization, evaluation, implementation, and knowledge translation.

conclusionsThe results of this evaluation seek to provide an understanding of the determinants affecting the implementation of IETPs. Service member, staff, and stakeholder insights will inform the state of implementation at each site, and quantitative measures will provide options for standardized outcome measures. This evaluation is expected to inform national Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Office policies and processes and knowledge translation efforts to improve and expand the IETP. Future work may include cost evaluations and rigorous research, such as randomized controlled trials. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44776.

Indexed as

Bayesianbrainbrain injuryCFIRcognitioncognitiveConsolidated Framework for Implementation Researchdirected acyclic grapheffect sizehealth care implementationimplementationinpatientmilitarymissing datamodalitynetwork analysispainparticipatoryposttraumatic stress disorderprotocolPTSDrecoveryrehabilitationscriptservice deliveryservice memberTBItraumatraumatictraumatic brain injurytreatment programveteran

Identifiers

PMID37159250
PMCPMC10206625
OpenAlexW4311624413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.