Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37158951›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Understanding who is and isn't involved and engaged in health research: capturing and analysing demographic data to diversify patient and public involvement and engagement.

Annie Keane, Safina Islam, Suzanne Parsons, Arpana Verma, Tracey Farragher, Davine Forde, Leah Holmes, Katharine Cresswell, Susannah Williams, Paolo Arru and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Operationalizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to build and support the lived experience workforce in direct health service provision.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. No Ethics Needed? Towards an Ethics of Care for Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Review
  9. Evaluating Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Activity Within the 3DPiPPIn Trial: A Qualitative Exploration of Contributors' Perspectives on Their Impact.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Facilitating consumer partnerships in health research.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Establishing a Public Involvement Network for Chronic Pain Research in the United Kingdom: Lessons Learned.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Annie KeaneVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Safina IslamAhmed Iqbal Ullah Race Relations Resource Centre and Education Trust (Previously at Vocal), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Suzanne ParsonsVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, NIHR Clinical Research Facility, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Arpana VermaDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care and Manchester Urban Collaboration, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tracey FarragherDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Davine FordeManchester BME Network CIC (Public Contributor and Community Partner), Manchester, UK.
Leah HolmesVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Katharine CresswellScience Policy and Research Programme (Previously at Vocal), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester, M1 4BT, UK.
Susannah WilliamsVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Paolo ArruVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Emily HowlettVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Hannah Turner-UaandjaVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, NIHR Clinical Research Facility, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Issy MacGregorVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Tracy GreyVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Zahra ArainVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Maura ScahillVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK.
Bella StarlingVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, The Nowgen Centre, Grafton Street, Manchester, M13 9WU, UK. bella.starling@mft.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) can improve the relevance, quality, ethics and impact of research thus contributing to high quality research. Currently in the UK, people who get involved in research tend to be aged 61 years or above, White and female. Calls for greater diversity and inclusion in PPIE have become more urgent especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, so that research can better address health inequalities and be relevant for all sectors of society. Yet, there are currently no routine systems or requirements to collect or analyse the demographics of people who get involved in health research in the UK. The aim of this study was to develop to capture and analyse the characteristics of who does and doesn't take part in patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) activities.

methodsAs part of its strategic focus on diversity and inclusion, Vocal developed a questionnaire to assess the demographics of people taking part in its PPIE activities. Vocal is a non-profit organisation which supports PPIE in health research across the region of Greater Manchester in England. The questionnaire was implemented across Vocal activities between December 2018 and March 2022. In that time. Vocal was working with approximately 935 public contributors. 329 responses were received: a return rate of 29.3%. Analysis of findings and comparison against local population demographic data, and available national data related to public contributors to health research, was performed.

resultsResults show that it is feasible to assess the demographics of people who take part in PPIE activities, through a questionnaire system. Further, our emerging data indicate that Vocal are involving people from a wider range of ages and with a greater diversity of ethnic backgrounds in health research, as compared to available national data. Specifically, Vocal involves more people of Asian, African and Caribbean heritage, and includes a wider range of ages in its PPIE activities. More women than men are involved in Vocal's work.

conclusionOur 'learn by doing' approach to assessing who does and doesn't take part in Vocal's PPIE activities has informed our practice and continues influence our strategic priorities for PPIE. Our system and learning reported here may be applicable and transferable to other similar settings in which PPIE is carried out. We attribute the greater diversity of our public contributors to our strategic priority and activities to promote more inclusive research since 2018.

Indexed as

DemographicsEquality, diversity and inclusion (EDI)Health inequalitiesInclusive research, inclusionPatient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE)Protected characteristics

Identifiers

PMID37158951
PMCPMC10165585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.