Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37158907›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2023

An analysis of migration and implications for health in government policy of South Africa.

Karima Manji, Shehani Perera, Johanna Hanefeld, Jo Vearey, Jill Olivier, Lucy Gilson, Helen Walls

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karima ManjiLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Global Health and Development, London, UK.
Shehani PereraSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Johanna HanefeldLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Global Health and Development, London, UK.
Jo VeareyThe African Centre for Migration & Society (ACMS), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jill OlivierSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lucy GilsonSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Helen WallsLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Global Health and Development, London, UK. Helen.Walls@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

Building Research in Inter-Disciplinary Gender and HIV through the Social Sciences (The BRIDGES Programme)D43TW011308 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI COLVIN, CHRISTOPHER JAMES · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011308Medical Research Council MR/S013601/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over a decade, the global health community has advanced policy engagement with migration and health, as reflected in multiple global-led initiatives. These initiatives have called on governments to provide universal health coverage to all people, regardless of their migratory and/or legal status. South Africa is a middle-income country that experiences high levels of cross-border and internal migration, with the right to health enshrined in its Constitution. A National Health Insurance Bill also commits the South African public health system to universal health coverage, including for migrant and mobile groups. We conducted a study of government policy documents (from the health sector and other sectors) that in our view should be relevant to issues of migration and health, at national and subnational levels in South Africa. We did so to explore how migration is framed by key government decision makers, and to understand whether positions present in the documents support a migrant-aware and migrant-inclusive approach, in line with South Africa's policy commitments. This study was conducted between 2019 and 2021, and included analysis of 227 documents, from 2002-2019. Fewer than half the documents identified (101) engaged directly with migration as an issue, indicating a lack of prioritisation in the policy discourse. Across these documents, we found that the language or discourse across government levels and sectors focused mainly on the potential negative aspects of migration, including in policies that explicitly refer to health. The discourse often emphasised the prevalence of cross-border migration and diseases, the relationship between immigration and security risks, and the burden of migration on health systems and other government resources. These positions attribute blame to migrant groups, potentially fuelling nationalist and anti-migrant sentiment and largely obscuring the issue of internal mobility, all of which could also undermine the constructive engagement necessary to support effective responses to migration and health. We provide suggestions on how to advance engagement with issues of migration and health in order for South Africa and countries of a similar context in regard to migration to meet the goal of inclusion and equity for migrant and mobile groups.

Indexed as

GovernmentPolicyAwarenessHuman MigrationHumansSouth AfricaHealth policyHealth systemMigrantMigrationSouth AfricaUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID37158907
PMCPMC10165765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.