Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37158840›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2023

Circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nan Wu, Hongyan Sun, Qian Sun, Fangqing Zhang, Lingli Ma, Yue Hu, Xianling Cong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Amelanotic Melanoma-Biochemical and Molecular Induction Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nan WuDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, PR China.
Hongyan SunDepartment of Biobank, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, PR China.
Qian SunDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, PR China.
Fangqing ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, PR China.
Lingli MaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, PR China.
Yue HuDepartment of Biobank, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, PR China.
Xianling CongDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Road 126, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, PR China. congxl@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5790-4188

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81903295The Scientific and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province 20200601010JC and 20210204150YY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have shown that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) can be used as diagnostic biomarkers for melanoma. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of circulating miRNAs for melanoma.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted and the quality of the included literature was evaluated using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment for diagnostic accuracy studies), and the diagnostic accuracy was assessed by pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). We used Deeks' funnel plot to evaluate publication bias.

resultsThe meta-analysis included 10 articles covering 16 studies, and the results showed that circulating miRNAs provide high diagnostic accuracy for melanoma. The overall pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), specificity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), PLR was 4.6 (95% CI: 3.7-5.8), NLR was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.11-0.23), DOR was 29 (95% CI: 18-49), and AUC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed better diagnostic value in miRNA clusters, European population, plasma miRNAs, and upregulated miRNAs compared to other subgroups.

conclusionsThe results indicated that circulating microRNAs can be used as a non-invasive biomarker for the diagnosis of melanoma.

Indexed as

Circulating MicroRNAMelanomaMicroRNAsArea Under CurveHumansOdds RatioCirculating MicroRNAMicroRNAsBiomarkersCirculating microRNADiagnosticMelanomaMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37158840
PMCPMC10165832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.