Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37158833›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Radiographic and α-fetoprotein response predict pathologic complete response to immunotherapy plus a TKI in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Cheng Huang, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Ying-Hao Shen, Bin Xu, Dong Wu, Yuan Ji, Ling-Li Chen, Tian-Qiang Song, Wei Zhang, Zhi-Ming Zeng and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prognostic Value of Pathological Response After Conversion Therapy and Salvage Surgery in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng Huang *Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiao-Dong Zhu *Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ying-Hao Shen *Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Bin Xu *Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Dong WuDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan JiDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ling-Li ChenDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tian-Qiang SongDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Oncology Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary, Oncology Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhi-Ming ZengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Hua-Sheng HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Kui WangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery II, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Lan-Qing HuangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery II, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yong-Jun ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Chen YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Le-Du ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Guo LongDepartment of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hai-Tao ZhaoDepartment of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yun-Chao WangDepartment of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ning-Ling GeDepartment of Hepatic Oncology, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi ChenDepartment of Hepatic Oncology, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chang-Jun TanDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jia FanDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Hui-Chuan SunDepartment of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. sun.huichuan@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Zhongshan Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFudan University · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNRuijin Hospital · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathologic complete response (pCR) following preoperative systemic therapy is associated with improved outcomes after subsequent liver transplant/resection in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the relationship between radiographic and histopathological response remains unclear.

methodsWe retrospectively examined patients with initially unresectable HCC who received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapy before undergoing liver resection between March 2019 and September 2021 across 7 hospitals in China. Radiographic response was evaluated using mRECIST. A pCR was defined as no viable tumor cells in resected samples.

resultsWe included 35 eligible patients, of whom 15 (42.9%) achieved pCR after systemic therapy. After a median follow-up of 13.2 months, tumors recurred in 8 non-pCR and 1 pCR patient. Before resection, there were 6 complete responses, 24 partial responses, 4 stable disease cases, and 1 progressive disease case, per mRECIST. Predicting pCR by radiographic response yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.727 (95% CI: 0.558-0.902), with an optimal cutoff value of 80% reduction in the enhanced area in MRI (called major radiographic response), which had a 66.7% sensitivity, 85.0% specificity, and a 77.1% diagnostic accuracy. When radiographic response was combined with α-fetoprotein response, the AUC was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.785-0.999); the optimal cutoff value was 0.446, which had a 91.7% sensitivity, 84.6%, specificity, and an 88.0% diagnostic accuracy.

conclusionsIn patients with unresectable HCC receiving combined TKI/anti-PD 1 therapy, major radiographic response alone or combined with α-fetoprotein response may predict pCR.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver Neoplasmsalpha-FetoproteinsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProtein Kinase InhibitorsRetrospective Studiesalpha-FetoproteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsConversion therapyHepatocellular carcinomaImmunotherapyPathologic complete responseTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID37158833
PMCPMC10169382
OpenAlexW4375955478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.