Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37158489›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2023

Transcutaneous bilirubinometry versus total serum bilirubin measurement for newborns.

Charles I Okwundu, Abiola Olowoyeye, Olalekan A Uthman, Johan Smith, Charles S Wiysonge, Vinod K Bhutani, Michelle Fiander, Kanekal S Gautham

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Transcutaneous bilirubin measurements in preterm infants: the impact of race, age, and phototherapy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Reconsidering transcutaneous bilirubinometry for management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: is it time for change?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Charles I OkwunduCentre for Evidence-based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abiola OlowoyeyePhoenix Children's Hospital and University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Olalekan A UthmanWarwick Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Johan SmithDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Charles S WiysongeCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Vinod K BhutaniDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Michelle FianderCochrane Neonatal Group, Halifax, Canada.
Kanekal S GauthamChair of Pediatrics and Pediatrician-in-Chief, Nemours Children's Health System, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Stellenbosch University · ZACochrane · CALucile Packard Children's Hospital · USNemours Children's Health System · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJaundice is a very common condition in newborns, affecting up to 60% of term newborns and 80% of preterm newborns in the first week of life. Jaundice is caused by increased bilirubin in the blood from the breakdown of red blood cells. The gold standard for measuring bilirubin levels is obtaining a blood sample and processing it in a laboratory. However, noninvasive transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) measurement devices are widely available and used in many settings to estimate total serum bilirubin (TSB) levels.

objectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of transcutaneous bilirubin measurement for detecting hyperbilirubinaemia in newborns. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and trial registries up to 18 August 2022. We also checked the reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews for other potentially eligible studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies that evaluated the accuracy of any TcB device compared to TSB measurement in term or preterm newborn infants (0 to 28 days postnatal age). All included studies provided sufficient data and information to create a 2 × 2 table for the calculation of measures of diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivities and specificities. We excluded studies that only reported correlation coefficients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently applied the eligibility criteria to all citations from the search and extracted data from the included studies using a standard data extraction form. We summarised the available results narratively and, where possible, we combined study data in a meta-analysis. MAIN

resultsWe included 23 studies, involving 5058 participants. All studies had low risk of bias as measured by the QUADAS 2 tool. The studies were conducted in different countries and settings, included newborns of different gestational and postnatal ages, compared various TcB devices (including the JM 101, JM 102, JM 103, BiliChek, Bilitest and JH20-1C) and used different cutoff values for a positive result. In most studies, the TcB measurement was taken from the forehead, sternum, or both. The sensitivity of various TcB cutoff values to detect significant hyperbilirubinaemia ranged from 74% to 100%, and specificity ranged from 18% to 89%. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe high sensitivity of TcB to detect hyperbilirubinaemia suggests that TcB devices are reliable screening tests for ruling out hyperbilirubinaemia in newborn infants. Positive test results would require confirmation through serum bilirubin measurement.

Indexed as

BilirubinJaundice, NeonatalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansHyperbilirubinemiaInfantInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningProspective StudiesBilirubin

Identifiers

PMID37158489
PMCPMC10167941
OpenAlexW4375955262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.