ReviewEFORT open reviews2023
3D printing for patient-specific implants in musculoskeletal oncology.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three dimensional printed patient-specific PEEK versus titanium mesh cage for anterior column reconstruction after spondylectomy for spinal tumours: a prospective controlled cohort study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Management of metastatic spinal disease in low- and middle-income countries: an international survey of practices and challenges in Latin America.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Retrospective Analysis of Pseudotumor of the Hip: Clinical Management and Outcomes.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Enhancing Precision in Pelvic Tumor Reconstruction: Early Experience and Iterative Design of Custom 3D-Printed Implants.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Reconstructive Planning in Orthoplastic Oncology: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Role of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in arthroplasty and orthopaedics: a review of biomechanical properties, surface modifications, and clinical outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Review
- Reconstruction of a large distal femoral giant cell tumor using a 3D-printed condylar support lattice metal implant and fibular grafts: a novel biomechanical and surgical approach.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Freeze drying and Lugol staining of human menisci reveal circumferential fibre volumes to guide meniscus implant design and virtual simulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in 3D Printing Applications for Personalized Orthopedic Surgery: From Anatomical Modeling to Patient-Specific Implants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Patient-specific 3D-Printed PEEK implants for spinal tumor surgery.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Insights into geometric deviations of medical 3d-printing: a phantom study utilizing error propagation analysis.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Accuracy of pelvic bone segmentation for 3d printing: a study of segmentation accuracy based on anatomic landmarks to evaluate the influence of the observer.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Bilateral pelvic osteotomy for malunion of a vertical shear fracture with 3D-printed patient-specific cutting guides: a case report.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Management of metastatic bone disease of the pelvis: current concepts.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Review
- Emerging Innovations in Preoperative Planning and Motion Analysis in Orthopedic Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- When Is a Two-Stage Surgical Procedure Indicated in the Treatment of Pseudotumors of the Hip? A Retrospective Study of 21 Cases and a Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Strategies for Bone Tuberculosis Management.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A 3D-printed patient-specific modular implants for pelvic reconstruction of bone tumors involving the sacroiliac joint.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Satisfactory results in terms of functional and oncological outcomes can be obtained in sacral and pelvic malignant bone tumors. Preoperative planning, adequate imaging, and a multidisciplinary approach are needed. 3D-printed prostheses have to fulfill several requirements: (i) mechanical stability, (ii) biocompatibility, (iii) implantability, and (iv) diagnostic compatibility. In this review, we highlight current standards in the use of 3D-printed technology for sacropelvic reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.