Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37158415›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2023

Microfasciectomy in Dupuytren's disease: microsurgery in the evolution toward safer and more efficient fasciectomy and hand surgery.

Ilse Degreef, Kira Vande Voorde, Maarten Van Nuffel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilse DegreefInstitute for Orthopedic Research and Training (IORT), Department of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2464-2641
Kira Vande VoordeInstitute for Orthopedic Research and Training (IORT), Department of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Maarten Van NuffelInstitute for Orthopedic Research and Training (IORT), Department of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the long term, limited fasciectomy is currently the most reliable treatment for Dupuytren's contracture. The risk for complications is significant, certainly in recurrent disease and in the presence of abundant scar tissue. Meticulous surgical technique is mandatory. Microsurgery increases magnification from four times (with surgical loupes) up to 40 times. Using the microscope in Dupuytren's surgery, a technique named microfasciectomy is likely to increase both safety and efficiency by preventing instead of treating surgical complications. Increased experience with microsurgery will benefit Dupuytren's treatment and hand surgery in general.

Indexed as

Dupuytrenfasciectomyhandmicrofasciectomymicrosurgery

Identifiers

PMID37158415
PMCPMC10233807
OpenAlexW4375955117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.