Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37158338›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2023

Biological aspects to enhance fracture healing.

Paul L Rodham, Vasileios P Giannoudis, Nikolaos K Kanakaris, Peter V Giannoudis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Initial fracture gap distance as a potential quantitative predictor for atlas fracture nonunion: A preliminary retrospective analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Application of collagen in bone regeneration.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Cellular therapies for bone repair: current insights.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul L RodhamAcademic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Vasileios P GiannoudisAcademic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Nikolaos K KanakarisAcademic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Peter V GiannoudisAcademic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5205-7696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to enhance fracture healing is paramount in modern orthopaedic trauma, particularly in the management of challenging cases including peri-prosthetic fractures, non-union and acute bone loss. Materials utilised in enhancing fracture healing should ideally be osteogenic, osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and facilitate vascular in-growth. Autologous bone graft remains the gold standard, providing all of these qualities. Limitations to this technique include low graft volume and donor site morbidity, with alternative techniques including the use of allograft or xenograft. Artificial scaffolds can provide an osteoconductive construct, however fail to provide an osteoinductive stimulus, and frequently have poor mechanical properties. Recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins can provide an osteoinductive stimulus; however, their licencing is limited and larger studies are required to clarify their role. For recalcitricant non-unions or high-risk cases, the use of composite graft combining the above techniques provides the highest chances of successfully achieving bony union.

Indexed as

bone graftbone substitutefracture healingnon-union

Identifiers

PMID37158338
PMCPMC10233810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.