Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37157917›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2023

Scanning electron microscopic analysis of adherent bacterial biofilms associated with peri-implantitis.

Jae W Chang, Jiarui Bi, Gethin Owen, Ya Shen, Markus Haapasalo, Colin Wiebe, Rana Tarzemany, Hannu Larjava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jae W ChangDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jiarui BiDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3068-2391
Gethin OwenDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ya ShenDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Markus HaapasaloDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Colin WiebeDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rana TarzemanyDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hannu LarjavaDivision of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeri-implantitis (PI) is caused by bacteria in the peri-implant space but the consensus on microbial profile is still lacking. Current microbial sampling of PI lesions has largely focused on analyzing bacterial species that have been shed from the implant surface and captured in the pocket fluid. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the morphotypes of bacteria in biofilm covering the implant threads and explore whether certain morphotypes were associated with PI.

methodsFourteen failed implants were removed and instantly processed for scanning electron microscope analysis. The implants were imaged at three equally divided sub-crestal levels of the exposed area. Bacterial morphotypes were identified and quantified by three examiners. Mobility and years in function were correlated to the presence of different morphotypes.

resultsThe implants demonstrated the presence of variable bacterial morphotypes that did not correlate to disease progression in our study. Some implants were dominated by filaments and others showed the presence of combinations of cocci/rods or spirilles/spirochetes. In general, all implants showed variable morphologic biofilm composition. However, individual implants tended to have similar composition throughout the entire implant. Rods and filaments were dominant morphotypes throughout the surfaces and cocci showed increased presence toward the apical third. There were some differences in the biofilm morphology with mobility and time in function.

conclusionsThe profiles of bacterial biofilm morphotypes in failing implants with similar clinical presentations were highly variable. While there were significant differences between implants, similar morphotypes in individual implants were often found throughout the entire surface.

Indexed as

Peri-ImplantitisBacteriaBiofilmsElectronsHumansMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningbacteriabiofilmperi-implantitis

Identifiers

PMID37157917
PMCPMC10441592
OpenAlexW4375955998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.