ArticleGenetics2023
Timesweeper: accurately identifying selective sweeps using population genomic time series.
Article in Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond two alleles: multiallelic genotypic selection and its estimation from time-series data.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Enhancing detection of polygenic adaptation: a comparative study of machine learning and statistical approaches using simulated evolve-and-resequence data.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Coalescence and translation: A language model for population genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Soft Selective Sweeps Predominate in the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Identifying Adaptive Footprints in the Presence of Demographic Uncertainty.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
- Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Selection Estimation from Genetic Time-Series Data: Effects of Limited Sampling and Genetic Drift.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Multiple-testing corrections in selection scans using identity-by-descent segments.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- diplo-locus: a lightweight toolkit for inference and simulation of time-series genetic data under general diploid selection.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Signatures of soft selective sweeps predominate in the yellow fever mosquitobioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- diplo-locus: A lightweight toolkit for inference and simulation of time-series genetic data under general diploid selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Adaptive genomic signatures of globally invasive populations of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Multiple-testing corrections in selection scans using identity-by-descent segments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Tree Sequences as a General-Purpose Tool for Population Genetic Inference.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Tree sequences as a general-purpose tool for population genetic inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Harnessing deep learning for population genetic inference.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite decades of research, identifying selective sweeps, the genomic footprints of positive selection, remains a core problem in population genetics. Of the myriad methods that have been developed to tackle this task, few are designed to leverage the potential of genomic time-series data. This is because in most population genetic studies of natural populations, only a single period of time can be sampled. Recent advancements in sequencing technology, including improvements in extracting and sequencing ancient DNA, have made repeated samplings of a population possible, allowing for more direct analysis of recent evolutionary dynamics. Serial sampling of organisms with shorter generation times has also become more feasible due to improvements in the cost and throughput of sequencing. With these advances in mind, here we present Timesweeper, a fast and accurate convolutional neural network-based tool for identifying selective sweeps in data consisting of multiple genomic samplings of a population over time. Timesweeper analyzes population genomic time-series data by first simulating training data under a demographic model appropriate for the data of interest, training a one-dimensional convolutional neural network on said simulations, and inferring which polymorphisms in this serialized data set were the direct target of a completed or ongoing selective sweep. We show that Timesweeper is accurate under multiple simulated demographic and sampling scenarios, identifies selected variants with high resolution, and estimates selection coefficients more accurately than existing methods. In sum, we show that more accurate inferences about natural selection are possible when genomic time-series data are available; such data will continue to proliferate in coming years due to both the sequencing of ancient samples and repeated samplings of extant populations with faster generation times, as well as experimentally evolved populations where time-series data are often generated. Methodological advances such as Timesweeper thus have the potential to help resolve the controversy over the role of positive selection in the genome. We provide Timesweeper as a Python package for use by the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.