Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37157227›Full record

ReviewFEBS open bio2023

Specificity models in MAPK cascade signaling.

Yan Ma, Jade Nicolet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS open bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Targeting the MAPK Pathway in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Human Stress Response Specificity through Bioresonance Selectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yan MaDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology, Biophore, UNIL-Sorge, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-9060
Jade NicoletDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology, Biophore, UNIL-Sorge, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9007-7719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise execution of various cellular functions relies on the maintenance of signaling specificity from input detection to cellular outputs. However, diverse signaling pathways share similar or identical intermediate components. A well-conserved intermediate, the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) cascade, participates in a myriad of signaling pathways, regulating signal transduction from input to output. This typifies the "hourglass conundrum", where a multitude of inputs and outputs all operate through a limited number of common intermediates. Therefore, understanding how MAPK cascades regulate a variety of outputs with specificity is a fundamental question in biology. This review highlights four major insulating mechanisms that improve signaling specificity: selective activation, compartmentalization, combinatorial signaling, and cross-pathway inhibition. We focus on plant pathways that share MAPK cascade components and compare mechanisms with those of animals and yeast. We hope this conceptual overview will aid future studies to better understand plant signaling specificity.

Indexed as

MAP Kinase Signaling SystemMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesAnimalsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal TransductionMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMAPK cascadeplant signalingRLK receptorssignaling specificity

Identifiers

PMID37157227
PMCPMC10315774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.