Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37157132›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2023

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: A Chemical Class of Emerging Concern.

William A Arnold, Arlene Blum, Jennifer Branyan, Thomas A Bruton, Courtney C Carignan, Gino Cortopassi, Sandipan Datta, Jamie DeWitt, Anne-Cooper Doherty, Rolf U Halden and 16 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Skin absorption and metabolism of [Toxicological research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

William A ArnoldUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-5469
Arlene BlumGreen Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94709, United States.
Jennifer BranyanCalifornia Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, California 95814, United States.
Thomas A BrutonCalifornia Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, California 95814, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4090-6021
Courtney C CarignanMichigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-0222
Gino CortopassiUniversity of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Sandipan DattaUniversity of California, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Jamie DeWittEast Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27834, United States.
Anne-Cooper DohertyCalifornia Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, California 95814, United States.
Rolf U HaldenArizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-7361
Homero HarariIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, United States.
Erica M HartmannNorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-2014
Terry C HrubecEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Shoba IyerCalifornia Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, California 94612, United States.
Carol F KwiatkowskiGreen Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94709, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-1218
Jonas LaPierGreen Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94709, United States.
Dingsheng LiUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8432-4023
Li LiUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-7366
Jorge G Muñiz OrtizUS Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland 20582, United States.
Amina SalamovaIndiana University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2174-030X
Ted SchettlerScience and Environmental Health Network, Bolinas, California 94924, United States.
Ryan P SeguinUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Anna SoehlGreen Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94709, United States.
Rebecca SuttonSan Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, California 94804, United States.
Libin XuUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-5200
Guomao ZhengSouthern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5235-9950

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
UC Davis Environmental Health Sciences Core CenterP30ES023513 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Jonathan London · 2015 to 2026
$26.0M
Environmetal Pathology/Toxicology Training ProgramT32ES007032 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FAUSTMAN, ELAINE M, ROSENFELD, MICHAEL E · 1985 to 2023
$10.7M
Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL DOHERTY · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Safe and Just Cleaners: Reducing exposure to toxic cleaning chemical products among low wage immigrant Latino Community members/R01ES027890 · NIEHS · QUEENS COLLEGE · PI BARON, SHERRY L, HARARI, HOMERO · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Interactions between metabolism, transport, and toxicity of benzalkonium chloridesR01ES031927 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI XU, LIBIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023513NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027890NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES031927NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), a large class of chemicals that includes high production volume substances, have been used for decades as antimicrobials, preservatives, and antistatic agents and for other functions in cleaning, disinfecting, personal care products, and durable consumer goods. QAC use has accelerated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the banning of 19 antimicrobials from several personal care products by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2016. Studies conducted before and after the onset of the pandemic indicate increased human exposure to QACs. Environmental releases of these chemicals have also increased. Emerging information on adverse environmental and human health impacts of QACs is motivating a reconsideration of the risks and benefits across the life cycle of their production, use, and disposal. This work presents a critical review of the literature and scientific perspective developed by a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional team of authors from academia, governmental, and nonprofit organizations. The review evaluates currently available information on the ecological and human health profile of QACs and identifies multiple areas of potential concern. Adverse ecological effects include acute and chronic toxicity to susceptible aquatic organisms, with concentrations of some QACs approaching levels of concern. Suspected or known adverse health outcomes include dermal and respiratory effects, developmental and reproductive toxicity, disruption of metabolic function such as lipid homeostasis, and impairment of mitochondrial function. QACs' role in antimicrobial resistance has also been demonstrated. In the US regulatory system, how a QAC is managed depends on how it is used, for example in pesticides or personal care products. This can result in the same QACs receiving different degrees of scrutiny depending on the use and the agency regulating it. Further, the US Environmental Protection Agency's current method of grouping QACs based on structure, first proposed in 1988, is insufficient to address the wide range of QAC chemistries, potential toxicities, and exposure scenarios. Consequently, exposures to common mixtures of QACs and from multiple sources remain largely unassessed. Some restrictions on the use of QACs have been implemented in the US and elsewhere, primarily focused on personal care products. Assessing the risks posed by QACs is hampered by their vast structural diversity and a lack of quantitative data on exposure and toxicity for the majority of these compounds. This review identifies important data gaps and provides research and policy recommendations for preserving the utility of QAC chemistries while also seeking to limit adverse environmental and human health effects.

Indexed as

COVID-19DisinfectantsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansPandemicsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisinfectantsQuaternary Ammonium Compoundsantimicrobial resistanceantistatic agentsCOVID-19disinfectantsessential usepersonal care productspolicyregrettable substitutionsoftenerssurface coatingssurfactants

Identifiers

PMID37157132
PMCPMC10210541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.