Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37157003›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Understanding Potentially Preventable Mortality Following Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Surgery: Analysis of a National Audit of Surgical Mortality.

David S Liu, Aly Fayed, Penelope Evans, Tim Bright, Ahmad Aly, Cuong Duong, John Spillane, Laurence Weinberg, David I Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. FAILURE TO RESCUE AFTER GASTRECTOMY: A NEW INDICATOR OF SURGICAL QUALITY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David S LiuUpper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Procedural Medicine, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. liu.davidsh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-4123
Aly Fayed *Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Procedural Medicine, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Penelope Evans *Flinders Medical Centre, Oesophago-gastric Surgery Unit, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Tim BrightFlinders Medical Centre, Oesophago-gastric Surgery Unit, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Ahmad AlyUpper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Procedural Medicine, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Cuong DuongDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John SpillaneDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Laurence WeinbergDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
David I WatsonFlinders Medical Centre, Oesophago-gastric Surgery Unit, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.

Funding

Austin Medical Research Foundation Grant-In-Aid 2022North Eastern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service Service Improvement Grant 2022Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation Discovery Partner FellowshipRoyal Australasian College of Surgeons Paul Mackay Bolton Grant for Cancer Research 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAt a national level, understanding preventable mortality after oesophago-gastric cancer surgery can direct quality-improvement efforts. Accordingly, utilizing the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM), we aimed to: (1) determine the causes of death following oesophago-gastric cancer resections in Australia, (2) quantify the proportion of potentially preventable deaths, and (3) identify clinical management issues contributing to preventable mortality.

methodsAll in-hospital mortalities following oesophago-gastric cancer surgery from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2020 were analysed using ANZASM data. Potentially preventable and non-preventable cases were compared. Thematic analysis with a data-driven approach was used to classify clinical management issues.

resultsOverall, 636 complications and 123 clinical management issues were identified in 105 mortalities. The most common causes of death were cardio-respiratory in aetiology. Forty-nine (46.7%) deaths were potentially preventable. These cases were characterized by higher rates of sepsis (59.2% vs 33.9%, p = 0.011), multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (40.8% vs 25.0%, p = 0.042), re-operation (63.3% vs 41.1%, p = 0.031) and other complications compared with non-preventable mortality. Potentially preventable mortalities also had more clinical management issues per patient [median (IQR): 2 (1-3) vs 0 (0-1), p < 0.001), which adversely impacted preoperative (30.6% vs 7.1%, p = 0.002), intraoperative (18.4% vs 5.4%, p = 0.037) and postoperative (51.0% vs 17.9%, p < 0.001) care. Thematic analysis highlighted recurrent areas of deficiency with preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative patient management.

conclusionsAlmost 50% of deaths following oesophago-gastric cancer resections were potentially preventable. These were characterized by higher complication rates and clinical management issues. We highlight recurrent themes in patient management to improve future quality of care.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAustraliaGastrectomyHumansQuality ImprovementSurvival RateAuditCancerGastricMortalityOesophagealSurgery

Identifiers

PMID37157003
PMCPMC10319683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.