Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37156650›Full record

SynthesisBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2023

Intrathecal trastuzumab versus alternate routes of delivery for HER2-targeted therapies in patients with HER2+ breast cancer leptomeningeal metastases.

Anna-Maria Lazaratos, Sarah M Maritan, Andrea Quaiattini, Amelie Darlix, Ivica Ratosa, Emanuela Ferraro, Gaia Griguolo, Valentina Guarneri, Alessia Pellerino, Silvia Hofer and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Leptomeningeal Disease: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Anna-Maria LazaratosRosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sarah M MaritanRosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Andrea QuaiattiniSchulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Amelie DarlixDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Ivica RatosaDivision of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Emanuela FerraroBreast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA.
Gaia GriguoloDivision of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Valentina GuarneriDivision of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Alessia PellerinoDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Silvia HoferDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
William JacotDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Hans-Joachim StemmlerMedical Dept. III, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munchen, Germany.
Marcel P H van den BroekClinical Pharmacy, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Nika DobnikarDivision of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Francois PanetGerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Zubin LahijanianDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Aki MorikawaBreast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA.
Andrew D SeidmanBreast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, USA.
Riccardo SoffiettiDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Lawrence PanasciGerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kevin PetreccaMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
April A N RoseGerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nathaniel BouganimGerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew DanknerRosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: matthew.dankner@mail.mcgill.ca.
McGill University · CAMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITUniversity of Padua · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer · CAInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIJewish General Hospital · CALudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMcGill University Health Centre · CAMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CASt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with HER2+ breast cancer (BC) frequently develop leptomeningeal metastases (LM). While HER2-targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings, including for parenchymal brain metastases, their efficacy for patients with LM has not been studied in a randomized controlled trial. However, several single-armed prospective studies, case series and case reports have studied oral, intravenous, or intrathecally administered HER2-targeted therapy regimens for patients with HER2+ BC LM.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+ BC LM in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Targeted therapies evaluated were trastuzumab (intrathecal or intravenous), pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with CNS-specific progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint.

results7780 abstracts were screened, identifying 45 publications with 208 patients, corresponding to 275 lines of HER2-targeted therapy for BC LM which met inclusion criteria. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we observed no significant difference in OS and CNS-specific PFS between intrathecal trastuzumab compared to oral or intravenous administration of HER2-targeted therapy. Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-based regimens did not demonstrate superiority over HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a cohort of 15 patients, treatment with trastuzumab-deruxtecan was associated with prolonged OS compared to other HER2-targeted therapies and compared to trastuzumab-emtansine.

conclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis, comprising the limited data available, suggest that intrathecal administration of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ BC LM confers no additional benefit over oral and/or IV treatment regimens. Although the number of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan in this cohort is small, this novel agent offers promise for this patient population and requires further investigation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesMeningeal NeoplasmsTrastuzumabAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumabBreast cancerDeruxtecanIntrathecalLeptomeningealTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID37156650
PMCPMC10300571
OpenAlexW4367625869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.